ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023
Evolution is not Uniform Along Coding Sequences.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for Non-optimal Codon Choice in Highly Transcribed Sex-Biased Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Recurrent innovation of protein-protein interactions in the Drosophila piRNA pathway.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Quantifying the Evolution of SNPs That Affect RNA Secondary Structure in Arabidopsis thaliana Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- The CpG Landscape of Protein Coding DNA in Vertebrates.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Type IV minor pilin ComN predicted the USS-receptor in Pasteurellaceae.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.The EMBO journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of Evolutionary Conservation, Expression Level, and Genetic Association at a Genome-wide Scale Reveals Heterogeneity Across Polygenic Phenotypes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Terminal regions of a protein are a hotspot for low complexity regions and selection.Open biology · 2024Article
- The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amino acids evolve at different speeds within protein sequences, because their functional and structural roles are different. Notably, amino acids located at the surface of proteins are known to evolve more rapidly than those in the core. In particular, amino acids at the N- and C-termini of protein sequences are likely to be more exposed than those at the core of the folded protein due to their location in the peptidic chain, and they are known to be less structured. Because of these reasons, we would expect that amino acids located at protein termini would evolve faster than residues located inside the chain. Here we test this hypothesis and found that amino acids evolve almost twice as fast at protein termini compared with those in the center, hinting at a strong topological bias along the sequence length. We further show that the distribution of solvent-accessible residues and functional domains in proteins readily explain how structural and functional constraints are weaker at their termini, leading to the observed excess of amino acid substitutions. Finally, we show that the specific evolutionary rates at protein termini may have direct consequences, notably misleading in silico methods used to infer sites under positive selection within genes. These results suggest that accounting for positional information should improve evolutionary models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.