Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857089›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2023

Government responses to COVID-19 and impact on GBV services and programmes: comparative analysis of the situation in South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria.

Neetu A John, Paul Bukuluki, Sara E Casey, Dhruvi B Chauhan, Moriam O Jagun, Nicoletta Mabhena, Mary Mwangi, Terry McGovern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Neetu A JohnAssistant Professor, Global Health Justice and Governance Program, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-1211
Paul BukulukiAssociate Professor, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sara E CaseyAssistant Professor, Global Health Justice and Governance Program, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8476-0327
Dhruvi B ChauhanMPH Student, Global Health Justice and Governance Program, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Moriam O JagunConsultant, Center for Bridging Health Gaps, Lagos State, Nigeria.
Nicoletta MabhenaManaging Director, ResearchLinkME, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mary MwangiIndependent Consultant, Nairobi, Kenya.
Terry McGovernDirector, Global Health Justice and Governance Program, Harriet and Robert H. Heilbrunn Professor and Chair, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USAfrican Conservation Centre · KELagos State Health Service Commission · NGMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As governments impose restrictive policies to contain infectious disease outbreaks, pre-existing gender-based inequalities are often exacerbated, increasing the risk of gender-based violence (GBV). Despite international guidance on the need for continued provision of GBV services during emergencies, governments often de-prioritise GBV services and programmes. We conducted a rapid assessment in South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria to examine the impact of COVID-19 policies on the availability of GBV prevention and response services. The study team interviewed 80 stakeholders representing different GBV services in the four countries. The interviews revealed strikingly similar government mis-steps that disrupted the availability of comprehensive GBV services. In all four countries, the government's failure to exempt the provision of multi-sectoral GBV services from initial lockdown restrictions led to confusion and disrupted the provision of critical GBV services such as clinical management of rape, legal and judicial services, psychosocial services, availability of shelters, and community-based prevention activities. The government's imposition of curfews, stay-at-home orders, and transportation restrictions further diminished access to services. Governments must strengthen currently available GBV prevention and response services and be better prepared for future pandemics. Following international guidelines, governments should deem GBV services as essential from the beginning with clear implementation plans. Governments must invest in community-based solutions and the expansion of digital tools to ensure everyone, especially those likely to be structurally excluded, have access to critical services during an emergency.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gender-Based ViolenceCommunicable Disease ControlGovernmentHumansKenyaNigeriaSouth AfricaUgandaCOVID-19 policiesGBV prevention and responseservice disruptionsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID36857089
PMCPMC9979981
OpenAlexW4322720400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.