ArticleJAMA network open2023
Functional and Safety Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke With Tandem Lesions.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Acute carotid stenting versus non-stenting treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Simultaneous treatment of symptomatic cervical and tandem intracranial carotid lesions using transcarotid artery revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Tandem Lesion Strokes: To Stent or Not to Stent, Insights From a Decade of Experience at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in Argentina.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy beyond 24 hours from last known well in tandem lesions: A multicenter cohort study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Endovascular management of tandem occlusions: current evidence and future directions.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Review
- Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Patients With Tandem Occlusion Thrombectomy: Analysis From the ASSIST International Registry.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention-Tandem Occlusion (EASI-TOC) study: protocol and rationale.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Direct carotid stenting with minimal predilation after embolic protection device crossing failure in cervical internal carotid artery dissection: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Emergent Carotid Stenting During Endovascular Therapy for Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.Journal of stroke · 2026Article
- Management of tandem occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Microcatheter delivery of embolic protection devices for acute atherosclerotic tandem occlusion: patient series.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Impact of atrial fibrillation on outcomes in stroke patients with tandem occlusions treated with thrombectomy: A multicentre study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Article
- PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem Lesion or Local Occlusion) Thrombectomy Randomized Trial: Study Protocol and Rationale.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Endovascular treatment for isolated cervical internal carotid artery occlusion: ETIICA study.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke of Different Mechanisms.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Effect of the Cervical Lesion Severity on Procedural and Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Tandem Lesions: A Multicenter Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Thrombectomy Selection in the Large Core Era: Implications for Regional Transfers.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Safety of emergent carotid stenting after thrombolysis: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Safety Outcomes of Antiplatelet Therapy During Endovascular Treatment of Tandem Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors at 19 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 10% to 20% of large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes involve tandem lesions (TLs), defined as concomitant intracranial LVO and stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may benefit patients with TLs; however, optimal management and procedural strategy of the cervical lesion remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association of carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs no stenting and medical management with functional and safety outcomes among patients with TL-LVOs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation TLs admitted across 17 stroke centers in the US and Spain between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to February 2022. Inclusion criteria were age of 18 years or older, endovascular therapy for intracranial occlusion, and presence of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) demonstrated on pre-MT computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography. Exposures: Patients with TLs were divided into CAS vs nonstenting groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary clinical and safety outcomes were 90-day functional independence measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), respectively. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), discharge mRS score, ordinal mRS score, and mortality at 90 days. Results: Of 685 patients, 623 (mean [SD] age, 67 [12.2] years; 406 [65.2%] male) were included in the analysis, of whom 363 (58.4%) were in the CAS group and 260 (41.6%) were in the nonstenting group. The CAS group had a lower proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (38 [10.6%] vs 49 [19.2%], P = .002), a higher proportion of preprocedural degree of cervical stenosis on digital subtraction angiography (90%-99%: 107 [32.2%] vs 42 [20.5%], P < .001) and atherosclerotic disease (296 [82.0%] vs 194 [74.6%], P = .003), a lower median (IQR) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (15 [10-19] vs 17 [13-21], P < .001), and similar rates of intravenous thrombolysis and stroke time metrics when compared with the nonstenting group. After adjustment for confounders, the odds of favorable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = .007), favorable shift in mRS scores (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.10; P = .04), and successful reperfusion (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-3.60; P = .002) were significantly higher for the CAS group compared with the nonstenting group. Both groups had similar odds of sICH (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.46-2.40; P = .87) and 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20; P = .27). No heterogeneity was noted for 90-day functional outcome and sICH in prespecified subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter, international cross-sectional study, CAS of the cervical lesion during MT was associated with improvement in functional outcomes and reperfusion rates without an increased risk of sICH and mortality in patients with TLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.