Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857051›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of an Exclusive Human Milk Diet on the Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nicholas D Embleton, Thomas Sproat, Sabita Uthaya, Gregory R Young, Shalabh Garg, Vimal Vasu, Andrea C Masi, Lauren Beck, Neena Modi, Christopher J Stewart and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The fifty billion dollar question: does formula cause necrotizing enterocolitis?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  12. The conundrum of intestinal injury in preterm infants receiving mother's own milk.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Formula protein versus human milk protein and the effects on growth in preterm born infants.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas D EmbletonNewcastle Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Thomas SproatNewcastle Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Sabita UthayaSection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gregory R YoungNorthumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Shalabh GargJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Vimal VasuWilliam Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom.
Andrea C MasiTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Lauren BeckTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Neena ModiSection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher J StewartTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Janet E BerringtonNewcastle Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBNorthumbria University · GBWilliam Harvey Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. Objective: To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. Interventions: Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. Main Outcomes and Measures: Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. Results: Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. Trial Registration: ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBirth WeightCattleDietFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMilk, Human

Identifiers

PMID36857051
PMCPMC9978942
OpenAlexW4322720221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.