Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856870›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Impact of pharmacist-led educational intervention on pneumococcal vaccination rates in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.

Nesligul Ozdemir, Burak Y Aktas, Ahmet Gulmez, Ahmet C Inkaya, Aygin Bayraktar-Ekincioglu, Saadettin Kilickap, Serhat Unal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nesligul OzdemirDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey. nesliozdmr@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-9549
Burak Y AktasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5460-4895
Ahmet GulmezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey.
Ahmet C InkayaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7943-8715
Aygin Bayraktar-EkinciogluDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-0074
Saadettin KilickapDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1637-7390
Serhat UnalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-4711
Hacettepe University · TRHacettepe University Hospital · TRInonu University · TRIstinye University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate clinical pharmacist's contribution to the pneumococcal vaccination rate by providing education to cancer patients in hospital settings.

methodsThis study was conducted in 2 tertiary-care hospitals' medical oncology outpatient clinics. Patients over 18 years of age and diagnosed with cancer for less than 2 years, in remission stage, and have not previously received the pneumococcal vaccine were included. Patients were randomized to intervention and control groups. The intervention group was provided vaccination education and recommended to receive the PCV13 vaccine. The control group received routine care. Patients' knowledge about pneumonia/pneumococcal vaccine, Vaccine Attitude Examination Scale (VAX) score, and vaccination rates were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the education.

resultsA total of 235 patients (intervention: 117, control: 118) were included. The mean age ± SD was 57.86 ± 11.88 years in the control and 60.68 ± 11.18 years in the intervention groups. The numbers of correct answers about pneumonia/pneumococcal vaccine (p = 0.482) and VAX scores (p = 0.244) of the groups were similar at baseline. After the intervention, the median (IQR) number of correct answers in intervention group [10(3)] was higher than control group [8(4)] (p < 0.001). After the education, the total VAX score (mean ± SD) was less in intervention group (33.09 ± 7.018) than the control group (36.07 ± 6.548) (p = 0.007). Three months after the education, 20.2% of the patients in the intervention and 6.1% in the control groups were vaccinated with pneumococcal vaccine (p = 0.003).

conclusionsThe pneumococcal vaccination rate in cancer patients has increased significantly by the education provided by a clinical pharmacist in hospital settings.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPharmacistsAdolescentAdultHumansPneumococcal VaccinesResearch DesignVaccinationPneumococcal VaccinesCancer patientsClinical pharmacistPatient educationPneumococcal vaccineVaccination rates

Identifiers

PMID36856870
PMCPMC9975445
OpenAlexW4322718766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.