Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856841›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks.

Raphael Sexauer, Patryk Hejduk, Karol Borkowski, Carlotta Ruppert, Thomas Weikert, Sophie Dellas, Noemi Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raphael SexauerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland. raphael.sexauer@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9949-7912
Patryk HejdukInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karol BorkowskiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlotta RuppertInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas WeikertDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Sophie DellasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Noemi SchmidtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHigh breast density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and adapt two (MLO, CC) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for automatic breast density classification on synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions.

methodsIn total, 4605 synthetic 2D images (1665 patients, age: 57 ± 37 years) were labeled according to the ACR (American College of Radiology) density (A-D). Two DCNNs with 11 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers each, were trained with 70% of the data, whereas 20% was used for validation. The remaining 10% were used as a separate test dataset with 460 images (380 patients). All mammograms in the test dataset were read blinded by two radiologists (reader 1 with two and reader 2 with 11 years of dedicated mammographic experience in breast imaging), and the consensus was formed as the reference standard. The inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy measures of automated classification were evaluated.

resultsThe two models for MLO and CC projections had a mean sensitivity of 80.4% (95%-CI 72.2-86.9), a specificity of 89.3% (95%-CI 85.4-92.3), and an accuracy of 89.6% (95%-CI 88.1-90.9) in the differentiation between ACR A/B and ACR C/D. DCNN versus human and inter-reader agreement were both "substantial" (Cohen's kappa: 0.61 versus 0.63).

conclusionThe DCNN allows accurate, standardized, and observer-independent classification of breast density based on the ACR BI-RADS system. KEY POINTS: • A DCNN performs on par with human experts in breast density assessment for synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. • The proposed technique may be useful for accurate, standardized, and observer-independent breast density evaluation of tomosynthesis.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerObserver VariationYoung AdultBreast densityBreast neoplasmsDeep learningMammographyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36856841
PMCPMC10289992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.