Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856737›Full record

ReviewPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2023

Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan.

Bomi Kim Hirsch, Michael C Stevenson, Marjory L Givens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Centering Community in Evidence-Based Prevention: Enhancing Evidence Criteria and Processes Across a State-Level Prevention System.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bomi Kim HirschUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. bomi.hirsch@chrr.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5412-4354
Michael C StevensonUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-2666
Marjory L GivensUniversity of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize evidence describing an intervention's impact on health equity. We conducted a systematic scan to explore how clearinghouses communicated an intervention's equity impact and reviewed their underlying methods and how they defined and operationalized health equity. In 2021, we identified 18 clearinghouses that were US-focused, web-based registries of interventions that assigned an intervention effectiveness rating for improving community health and the social determinants of health. We reviewed each clearinghouse's website and collected publicly available information about their health equity impact review, review methods, and health equity definitions and values. We conducted a comparative analysis among select clearinghouses using qualitative methods. Among the 18 clearinghouses, fewer than half (only seven) summarized an intervention's potential impact on health equity. Overall, those seven clearinghouses defined and operationalized equity differently, and most lacked transparency in their review methods. Clearinghouses used one or more approaches to communicate findings from their review: summarize study findings on differential impact for subpopulations, curate interventions that reduce health disparities, and/or assign a disparity/equity rating to each intervention. Evidence clearinghouses can enhance equity-focused methods and be transparent in their underlying values to better support the uptake and implementation of evidence-informed interventions to advance health equity. However, clearinghouses are unable to do so without underlying equity-focused empirical evidence.

Indexed as

Health EquityHumansPublic HealthEvidence-based program registriesEvidence clearinghouseHealth disparity impactHealth equity impact

Identifiers

PMID36856737
PMCPMC10227106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.