Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856733›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2023

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment.

Pia Burman, Olivera Casar-Borota, Luis Gustavo Perez-Rivas, Olaf M Dekkers

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Aggressive Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Trial
  3. Therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  4. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EndoBridge 2024: pearls and highlights.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Pia BurmanDepartment of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4844-8336
Olivera Casar-BorotaDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology; Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Luis Gustavo Perez-RivasMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Olaf M DekkersDepartment of Internal Medicine (Section of Endocrinology & Clinical Epidemiology), Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLLMU Klinikum · DELund University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 314061271-TRR 205)Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet, SwedenSwedish Cancer Society 190157 Fk
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are heterogeneous with regard to clinical presentation, proliferative markers, clinical course, and response to therapy. Half of them show an aggressive course only many years after the first apparently benign presentation. APTs and PCs share several properties, but a Ki67 index greater than or equal to 10% and extensive p53 expression are more prevalent in PCs. Mutations in TP53 and ATRX are the most common genetic alterations; their detection might be of value for early identification of aggressiveness. Treatment requires a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Temozolomide is the recommended first-line chemotherapy, with response rates of about 40%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as second-line treatment in PCs, with currently no evidence for a superior effect of dual therapy compared to monotherapy with PD-1 blockers. Bevacizumab has resulted in partial response (PR) in few patients; tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus have generally not been useful. The effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is limited as well. Management of APT/PC is challenging and should be discussed within an expert team with consideration of clinical and pathological findings, age, and general condition of the patient. Considering that APT/PCs are rare, new therapies should preferably be evaluated in shared standardized protocols. Prognostic and predictive markers to guide treatment decisions are needed and are the scope of ongoing research.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsBevacizumabHumansTemozolomideBevacizumabTemozolomideATRXbevacizumabimmunotherapyKi67- indexPRRTtemozolomideTP53

Identifiers

PMID36856733
PMCPMC10271233
OpenAlexW4322719870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.