Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856618›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2023

Cancer Screening after the Adoption of Paid-Sick-Leave Mandates.

Kevin Callison, Michael F Pesko, Serena Phillips, Julie A Sosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond borders: Does firm-level exposure to state and local paid sick leave mandates lead to intra-firm spillovers?Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010 to 2018.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  17. Housing Status and Cancer Screening in US Veterans.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin CallisonFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans (K.C.); the Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta (M.F.P., S.P.); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-4181-7407
Michael F PeskoFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans (K.C.); the Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta (M.F.P., S.P.); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (J.A.S.).
Serena PhillipsFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans (K.C.); the Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta (M.F.P., S.P.); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (J.A.S.).
Julie A SosaFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans (K.C.); the Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta (M.F.P., S.P.); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (J.A.S.).

Funding

Paid Sick Leave Mandates and Cancer PreventionR01CA237888 · NCI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALLISON, KEVIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237888NCI NIH HHS R01CA237888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy the end of 2022, nearly 20 million workers in the United States have gained paid-sick-leave coverage from mandates that require employers to provide benefits to qualified workers, including paid time off for the use of preventive services. Although the lack of paid-sick-leave coverage may hinder access to preventive care, current evidence is insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions about its relationship to cancer screening.

methodsWe examined the association between paid-sick-leave mandates and screening for breast and colorectal cancers by comparing changes in 12- and 24-month rates of colorectal-cancer screening and mammography between workers residing in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that have been affected by paid-sick-leave mandates (exposed MSAs) and workers residing in unexposed MSAs. The comparisons were conducted with the use of administrative medical-claims data for approximately 2 million private-sector employees from 2012 through 2019.

resultsPaid-sick-leave mandates were present in 61 MSAs in our sample. Screening rates were similar in the exposed and unexposed MSAs before mandate adoption. In the adjusted analysis, cancer-screening rates were higher among workers residing in exposed MSAs than among those in unexposed MSAs by 1.31 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 2.34) for 12-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.56 percentage points (95% CI, 0.33 to 2.79) for 24-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.22 percentage points (95% CI, -0.20 to 2.64) for 12-month mammography, and 2.07 percentage points (95% CI, 0.15 to 3.99) for 24-month mammography.

conclusionsIn a sample of private-sector workers in the United States, cancer-screening rates were higher among those residing in MSAs exposed to paid-sick-leave mandates than among those residing in unexposed MSAs. Our results suggest that a lack of paid-sick-leave coverage presents a barrier to cancer screening. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSick LeaveHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMammographyMandatory ProgramsSalaries and Fringe BenefitsUnited StatesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID36856618
PMCPMC10084522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.