Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36856124›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2023

The utility of machine learning for predicting donor discard in abdominal transplantation.

Rowland W Pettit, Britton B Marlatt, Travis J Miles, Selim Uzgoren, Stuart J Corr, Anil Shetty, Jim Havelka, Abbas Rana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acceptance of deceased donor livers in the United Kingdom - development of a liver "donor utilisation index".Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rowland W PettitDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-8714
Britton B MarlattResearch and Development, InformAI, Houston, Texas.
Travis J MilesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Abdominal, Transplantation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Selim UzgorenResearch and Development, InformAI, Houston, Texas.
Stuart J CorrDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anil ShettyResearch and Development, InformAI, Houston, Texas.
Jim HavelkaResearch and Development, InformAI, Houston, Texas.
Abbas RanaDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-0598
Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica · ESBaylor College of Medicine · USSwansea University · GB

Funding

Research Training Program in Cardiovascular SurgeryT32HL139430 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Todd K Rosengart · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL139430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing access and better allocation of organs in the field of transplantation is a critical problem in clinical care. Limitations exist in accurately predicting allograft discard. Potential exists for machine learning to provide a balanced assessment of the potential for an organ to be used in a transplantation procedure.

methodsWe accessed and utilized all available deceased donor United Network for Organ Sharing data from 1987 to 2020. With these data, we evaluated the performance of multiple machine learning methods for predicting organ use. The machine learning methods trialed included XGBoost, random forest, Naïve Bayes (NB), logistic regression, and fully connected feedforward neural network classifier methods. The top two methods, XGBoost and random forest, were fully developed using 10-fold cross-validation and Bayesian optimization of hyperparameters.

resultsThe top performing model at predicting liver organ use was an XGBoost model which achieved an AUC-ROC of .925, an AUC-PR of .868, and an F1 statistic of .756. The top performing model for predicting kidney organ use classification was an XGBoost model which achieved an AUC-ROC of .952, and AUC-PR of .883, and an F1 statistic of .786.

conclusionsThe XGBoost method demonstrated a significant improvement in predicting donor allograft discard for both kidney and livers in solid organ transplantation procedures. Machine learning methods are well suited to be incorporated into the clinical workflow; they can provide robust quantitative predictions and meaningful data insights for clinician consideration and transplantation decision-making.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTissue DonorsBayes TheoremHumansLogistic Modelsdiscardmachine learningoutcomespredictionrandom foresttransplantationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID36856124
PMCPMC11323256
OpenAlexW4322719618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.