ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2023
Effects of traditional stretching versus self-myofascial release warm-up on physical performance in well-trained female athletes.
Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effects of three warm-up protocols on drop jump biomechanics in elite Taekwondo athletes: An IMU-based analysis.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Counteracting Static Stretching-Induced Anaerobic Performance Impairment: The Role of Caffeine.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Article
- Acute, chronic, and detraining effects of dynamic stretching and tissue flossing on muscle function, sprint performance, balance, and proprioception, in soccer players with hamstring shortness: a three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial protocol.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Effects of Workplace Supervised Exercise on Psychological Capital: An Intervention Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of Self-Myofascial Release on Athletes' Physical Performance: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Review
- Fatigue and recovery-related changes in postural and core stability in sedentary employees: a study protocol.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- A Review of the Application of Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of self-myofascial release (SMR) versus traditional stretching used as a part of warm-up on physical performance in well-trained female athletes.
methodsTwenty-three participants (age, 21.8±1.73 years; experience in sport, 114.8±30.5 months) were recruited. Isokinetic peak torque and muscle endurance ratio were measured during knee extension and flexion at 60°/s and 180°/s. Jump height, reactive strength index, and leg stiffness were measured using a jump mat during a counter-movement jump. Hamstring flexibility was measured using a sit-and-reach test. Three interventions were performed by all athletes randomly within 72 hours intervals.
resultsThe jump height and hamstring flexibility test scores improved significantly more after dynamic stretching (DS) as compared to SMR and static stretching (SS). The DS and SMR exercises were more effective than the SS exercises in terms of right and left knee muscle isokinetic strength both at 60°/s, and 180°/s. With regard to keeping muscular endurance ratio (%), SS exercises were found more effective than DS and SMR exercises for only the right knee at 180°/s, but not left knee muscle.
conclusionDynamic stretching and SMR showed better flexibility, strength, and jump performance than SS. Trainers and players may replace SS with DS and SMR to acutely improve muscle power, strength, and flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36856101PMC9976183W4322719928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.