ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023
Motor recalibration of visual and saccadic maps.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global spatial errors and local feature errors drive oculomotor learning.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Actions as perceptual experiments.Journal of vision · 2026Review
- Serial dependencies in motor targeting as a function of target appearance.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Altered oculomotor flexibility is linked to high autistic traits.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Motor recalibration of visual and saccadic maps.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How does the brain maintain an accurate visual representation of external space? Movement errors following saccade execution provide sufficient information to recalibrate motor and visual space. Here, we asked whether spatial information for vision and saccades is processed in shared or in separate resources. We used saccade adaptation to modify both, saccade amplitudes and visual mislocalization. After saccade adaptation was induced, we compared participants' saccadic and perceptual localization before and after we inserted 'no error' trials. In these trials, we clamped the post-saccadic error online to the predicted endpoints of saccades. In separate experiments, we either annulled the retinal or the prediction error. We also varied the number of 'no error' trials across conditions. In all conditions, we found that saccade adaptation remained undisturbed by the insertion of 'no error' trials. However, mislocalization decreased as a function of the number of trials in which zero retinal error was displayed. When the prediction error was clamped to zero, no mislocalization was observed at all. The results demonstrate the post-saccadic error is used separately to recalibrate visual and saccadic space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.