Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855829›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma: A Unique Immuno-Molecular Entity and a Clinical Challenge in the Current Therapeutic Scenario.

Giulia Mazzaschi, Giulia Claire Giudice, Matilde Corianò, Davide Campobasso, Fabiana Perrone, Michele Maffezzoli, Irene Testi, Luca Isella, Umberto Maestroni, Sebastiano Buti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia MazzaschiMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giulia Claire GiudiceMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8541-1655
Matilde CorianòMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Davide CampobassoDepartment of Urology, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-114X
Fabiana PerroneMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Michele MaffezzoliMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Irene TestiMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Luca IsellaMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Umberto MaestroniDepartment of Urology, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most frequent malignancy of the urinary tract, which consists of bladder cancer (BC) for 90%, while 5% to 10%, of urinary tract UC (UTUC). BC and UTUC are characterized by distinct phenotypical and genotypical features as well as specific gene- and protein- expression profiles, which result in a diverse natural history of the tumor. With respect to BC, UTUC tends to be diagnosed in a later stage and displays poorer clinical outcome. In the present review, we seek to highlight the individuality of UTUC from a biological, immunological, genetic-molecular, and clinical standpoint, also reporting the most recent evidence on UTUC treatment. In this regard, while the role of surgery in nonmetastatic UTUC is undebated, solid data on adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy are still an unmet need, not permitting a definite paradigm shift in the standard treatment. In advanced setting, evidence is mainly based on BC literature and retrospective studies and confirms platinum-based combination regimens as bedrock of first-line treatment. Recently, immunotherapy and target therapy are gaining a foothold in the treatment of metastatic disease, with pembrolizumab and atezolizumab showing encouraging results in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line strategy. Moreover, atezolizumab performed well as a maintenance treatment, while pembrolizumab as a single agent achieved promising outcomes in second-line setting. Regarding the target therapy, erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, proved to have a strong antitumor property, likely due to the distinctive immune-genetic background of UTUC. In this context, great efforts have been addressed to uncover the biological, immunological, and clinical grounds in UTUC patients in order to achieve a personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary TractHumansImmunotherapyRetrospective Studiesclinical managementgenomic profileimmune backgroundupper tract urinary carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36855829
PMCPMC9983117
OpenAlexW4322719984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.