Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855822›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

Bayesian semiparametric joint modeling of a count outcome and inconveniently timed longitudinal predictors.

Woobeen Lim, Michael L Pennell, Michelle J Naughton, Electra D Paskett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Woobeen LimDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4154-5133
Michael L PennellDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2602-3126
Michelle J NaughtonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Electra D PaskettDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Women's Health Initiative Cancer Survivor CohortUM1CA173642 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L., CAAN, BETTE J · 2013 to 2018
$12.1M
Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC): The Women's Health Initiative Cancer Survivor CohortU01CA173642 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L., PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2019 to 2023
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA173642NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173642NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC) study is an excellent resource for studying the quality of life following breast cancer treatment. At study entry, women were asked about new symptoms that appeared following their initial cancer treatment. In this article, we were interested in using regression modeling to estimate associations of clinical and lifestyle factors at cancer diagnosis (independent variables) with the number of new symptoms (dependent variable). Although clinical and lifestyle data were collected longitudinally, few measurements were obtained at diagnosis or at a consistent timepoint prior to diagnosis, which complicates the analysis. Furthermore, parametric count models, such as the Poisson and negative binomial, do not fit the symptom data well. Thus, motivated by the issues encountered in LILAC, we propose two Bayesian joint models for longitudinal data and a count outcome. Our two models differ according to the assumption on the outcome distribution: one uses a negative binomial (NB) distribution and the other a nonparametric rounded mixture of Gaussians (RMG). The mean of each count distribution is dependent on imputed values of continuous, binary, and ordinal variables at a time point of interest (e.g. diagnosis). To facilitate imputation, longitudinal variables are modeled jointly using a linear mixed model for a latent underlying normal random variable, and a Dirichlet process prior is assigned to the random subject-specific effects to relax distribution assumptions. In simulation studies, the RMG joint model exhibited superior power and predictive accuracy over the NB model when the data were not NB. The RMG joint model also outperformed an RMG model containing predictors imputed using the last value carried forward, which generated estimates that were biased toward the null. We used our models to examine the relationship between sleep health at diagnosis and the number of new symptoms following breast cancer treatment in LILAC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeBayes TheoremComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalBreast cancer treatmentDirichlet processimputationnegative binomialsymptoms dataWomen's Health Initiative

Identifiers

PMID36855822
PMCPMC10725663
OpenAlexW4322718913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.