Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855679›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Work from home: A behavioral model of Indonesian education workers' productivity during Covid-19.

Fendy Suhariadi, Rini Sugiarti, Dwi Hardaningtyas, Rina Mulyati, Evi Kurniasari, Nurlailis Saadah, Hilmi Yumni, Ansar Abbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fendy SuhariadiHuman Resources Development, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Rini SugiartiDepartment of Psychology, Universitas Semarang, Indonesia.
Dwi HardaningtyasAdministration Science, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia.
Rina MulyatiPsychology Faculty, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.
Evi KurniasariPsychology Faculty, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda, Indonesia.
Nurlailis SaadahPoliteknik Kesehatan, Kementrian Kesehatan Surabaya, Indonesia.
Hilmi YumniPoliteknik Kesehatan, Kementrian Kesehatan Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ansar AbbasDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is not a new phenomenon, many present employees have not previously encountered it. The Covid-19 outbreak has turned the concept of Work from Home (WFH) into a legally regulated and severely enforced norm, which is now in effect. This idea is vital for developing practical organizational policies and procedures in the future in specific educational sectors pertinent to academics. The effectiveness of an individual's ability to cope with WFH was evaluated using a theoretical framework created to measure productivity. The model was evaluated on individuals from a top-ranking public university in Indonesia, chosen as the target population. A total number of 556 respondents responded to the survey questionnaire. AMOS was used to analyze statistical responses related to job crafting, work stress, organizational support, boredom, work engagement, productivity, and mental health. The structural equation analysis, also known as the SEM, was used for this work's measurement model. The findings revealed that the productive conduct of teaching teachers and staff played a substantial role in the success of the work-from-home situation. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate that the indicators used to measure productive behavior while working from home are accurate. As a result, the hypothesis has been proven correct. The study's ecological implications are explained in the relevant sections of this paper.

Indexed as

Education workersNew normsProductive behaviorWell-beingWork from home

Identifiers

PMID36855679
PMCPMC9951094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.