Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855559›Full record

ReviewJournal of blood medicine2023

Effectiveness of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CCP) During the Pandemic Era: A Literature Review.

Usha Rani Kandula, Techane Sisay Tuji, Dinkinesh Begna Gudeta, Kassech Leta Bulbula, Anwar Abdulwahed Mohammad, Ketema Diriba Wari, Ahmad Abbas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Operation Warp Speed offers a roadmap for improving the efficiency of bench to bedside medical advances.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. COVID-19 and chronic kidney disease: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Usha Rani KandulaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-9027
Techane Sisay TujiDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Dinkinesh Begna GudetaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Kassech Leta BulbulaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Anwar Abdulwahed MohammadDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Ketema Diriba WariDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Ahmad AbbasDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Asossa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide pandemic with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) was caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). As November 2, 2022, World Health Organization (WHO) received 628,035,553 reported incidents on COVID-19, with 6,572,800 mortalities and, with a total 12,850,970,971 vaccine doses have been delivered as of October 31, 2022. The infection can cause mild or self-limiting symptoms of pulmonary and severe infections or death may be caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Simultaneously, antivirals, corticosteroids, immunological treatments, antibiotics, and anticoagulants have been proposed as potential medicines to cure COVID-19 affected patients. Among these initial treatments, COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP), which was retrieved from COVID-19 recovered patients to be used as passive immune therapy, in which antibodies from cured patients were given to infected patients to prevent illness. Such treatment has yielded the best results in earlier with preventative or early stages of illness. Convalescent plasma (CP) is the first treatment available when infectious disease initially appears, although few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate its effectiveness. The historical record suggests with potential benefit for other respiratory infections, as coronaviruses like Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoV-I (SARS-CoV-I) and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), though the analysis of such research is constrained by some non-randomized experiments (NREs). Rigorous studies on CP are made more demanding by the following with the immediacy of the epidemics, CP use may restrict the ability to utilize it for clinical testing, non-homogenous nature of product, highly decentralized manufacturing process; constraints with capacity to measure biologic function, ultimate availability of substitute therapies, as antivirals, purified immune globulins, or monoclonal antibodies. Though, it is still not clear how effectively CCP works among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The current review tries to focus on its efficiency and usage in clinical scenarios and identifying existing benefits of implementation during pandemic or how it may assist with future pandemic preventions.

Indexed as

CCPconvalescent plasmacoronavirus disease-2019COVID-19COVID-19 convalescent plasmaeffectivenessliterature reviewpandemic eraSARA-CoV-2severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-coronavirus-2

Identifiers

PMID36855559
PMCPMC9968437
OpenAlexW4321498114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.