Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855428›Full record

ArticleACS polymers Au2021

Pliable, Scalable, and Degradable Scaffolds with Varying Spatial Stiffness and Tunable Compressive Modulus Produced by Adopting a Modular Design Strategy at the Macrolevel.

Hailong Liu, Shubham Jain, Astrid Ahlinder, Tiziana Fuoco, T Christian Gasser, Anna Finne-Wistrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS polymers Au, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hailong LiuDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shubham JainDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Astrid AhlinderDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-7858
Tiziana FuocoDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-9158
T Christian GasserSolid Mechanics, Department of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Finne-WistrandDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-128X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical results obtained when degradable polymer-based medical devices are used in breast reconstruction following mastectomy are promising. However, it remains challenging to develop a large scaffold structure capable of providing both sufficient external mechanical support and an internal cell-like environment to support breast tissue regeneration. We propose an internal-bra-like prototype to solve both challenges. The design combines a 3D-printed scaffold with knitted meshes and electrospun nanofibers and has properties suitable for both breast tissue regeneration and support of a silicone implant. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to predict the macroscopic and microscopic stiffnesses of the proposed structure. The simulations show that introduction of the mesh leads to a macroscopic scaffold stiffness similar to the stiffness of breast tissue, and mechanical testing confirms that the introduction of more layers of mesh in the modular design results in a lower elastic modulus. The compressive modulus of the scaffold can be tailored within a range from hundreds of kPa to tens of kPa. Biaxial tensile testing reveals stiffening with increasing strain and indicates that rapid strain-induced softening occurs only within the first loading cycle. In addition, the microscopic local stiffness obtained from FEA simulations indicates that cells experience significant heterogeneous mechanical stimuli at different places in the scaffold and that the local mechanical stimulus generated by the strand surface is controlled by the elastic modulus of the polymer, rather than by the scaffold architecture. From

Identifiers

PMID36855428
PMCPMC9954393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.