Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855244›Full record

ArticleThe Libyan journal of medicine2023

Psychological effect of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals of Yemen and coping strategies.

Nagd Mohammed Ahmed Mahmood, Sitaram Khadka, Mohammad Saleem, Maroa Ahmed Ali Mohammed Alkamel, Maged Mohammed Salem Saeed Khudhiere, Prem Prasad Panta, Muhammad Abdul Jabar Adnan, Gopal K Yadav

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Libyan journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Coping strategies of health professionals suspected or confirmed to have COVID-19 in a teaching maternity hospital.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nagd Mohammed Ahmed MahmoodDepartment of Community Pharmacy, Palsm Pharmacy, Aden, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-5840
Sitaram KhadkaDepartment of Pharmacology, Punjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-3817
Mohammad SaleemDepartment of Pharmacology, Punjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-1584
Maroa Ahmed Ali Mohammed AlkamelFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen.
Maged Mohammed Salem Saeed KhudhiereFaculty of Dentistry, University of Aden, Aden, Yemen.
Prem Prasad PantaDepartment of Statistics, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Jumla, Nepal.
Muhammad Abdul Jabar AdnanDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Gopal K YadavDepartment of Internal Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-9152
University of the Punjab · PKB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPKarnali Academy of Health Sciences · NPTaiz University · YEUniversity of Aden · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic has triggered psychological stress such as anxiety and depression among people around the globe. Due to the nature of the job, healthcare professionals (HCPs) are at high risk of infection and are facing social stigma as well. This research was conducted with the objective to evaluate the psychological influence of the COVID-19 pandemic among HCPs in Yemen and the coping strategies adopted thereof. A web-based, as well as face-to-face cross-sectional study was carried out from July to December 2021 among HCPs of Yemen. The generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Brief-COPE scales were applied for the evaluation of anxiety, depression, and coping strategies. A total of 197 HCPs participated in the study where 28.4% and 43.1% had anxiety and depression respectively. The prevalence of both anxiety and depression in the majority were found of the minimal to none and mild categories (71.6% vs. 56.9% respectively). The respondents who had received training on COVID-19 had statistically significant lower GAD-7 scores than those who did not (6.32 vs. 8.02 respectively). A significant statistical difference was observed between physicians versus nurses regarding depression based on the working area (p < 0.05). The physician and pharmacist had a significant positive association with brief COPE scores at the 50th centile compared to other HCPs. The female respondents had statistically significant higher mean Brief COPE scores than male respondents (78.11 vs. 69.50 respectively). Our findings illustrate the requirement for efficient policies through administrative, clinical, and welfare perspectives from the regulatory body in preparedness and preventive measures towards such a pandemic that aids HCPs to provide service in a stress-free condition and assurance of a better healthcare system..

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19Health PersonnelPandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYemenanxiety disordersCOVID-19Depressionhealthcare professionalspandemicspsychologicalYemen

Identifiers

PMID36855244
PMCPMC9979999
OpenAlexW4322720393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.