Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855149›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Machine learning and network analysis for diagnosis and prediction in disorders of consciousness.

Ajit Narayanan, Wendy L Magee, Richard J Siegert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ajit NarayananDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. ajit.narayanan@aut.ac.nz.
Wendy L MageeBoyer College of Music and Dance, Music Education and Therapy, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Richard J SiegertDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged Disorders of Consciousness (PDOC) resulting from severe acquired brain injury can lead to complex disabilities that make diagnosis challenging. The role of machine learning (ML) in diagnosing PDOC states and identifying intervention strategies is relatively under-explored, having focused on predicting mortality and poor outcome. This study aims to: (a) apply ML techniques to predict PDOC diagnostic states from variables obtained from two non-invasive neurobehavior assessment tools; and (b) apply network analysis for guiding possible intervention strategies.

methodsThe Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a well-established tool for assessing patients with PDOC. More recently, music has been found to be a useful medium for assessment of coma patients, leading to the standardization of a music-based assessment of awareness: Music Therapy Assessment Tool for Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness (MATADOC). CRS-R and MATADOC data were collected from 74 PDOC patients aged 16-70 years at three specialist centers in the USA, UK and Ireland. The data were analyzed by three ML techniques (neural networks, decision trees and cluster analysis) as well as modelled through system-level network analysis.

resultsPDOC diagnostic state can be predicted to a relatively high level of accuracy that sets a benchmark for future ML analysis using neurobehavioral data only. The outcomes of this study may also have implications for understanding the role of music therapy in interdisciplinary rehabilitation to help patients move from one coma state to another.

conclusionsThis study has shown how ML can derive rules for diagnosis of PDOC with data from two neurobehavioral tools without the need to harvest large clinical and imaging datasets. Network analysis using the measures obtained from these two non-invasive tools provides novel, system-level ways of interpreting possible transitions between PDOC states, leading to possible use in novel, next-generation decision-support systems for PDOC.

Indexed as

ComaConsciousness DisordersBenchmarkingCluster AnalysisHumansMachine LearningAssessmentCRS-RDisorders of consciousnessMachine learningMusic therapyNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID36855149
PMCPMC9972731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.