Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855140›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Socio-economic and education related inequities in use of modern contraceptive in seven sub-regions in Uganda.

Fredrick E Makumbi, Sarah Nabukeera, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Cissie Namanda, Lynn Atuyambe, Aggrey Mukose, Sarah Ssali, Ronald Ssenyonga, Ritah Tweheyo, Andrew Gidudu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modern Contraceptive Use Among Young Women in Kampala Slums: Research Findings from the TOPOWA Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fredrick E MakumbiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. fmakumbi@musph.ac.ug.
Sarah NabukeeraSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Nazarius Mbona TumwesigyeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Cissie NamandaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Lynn AtuyambeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Aggrey MukoseSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah SsaliSchool of Women and Gender studies, Makerere University, Makerere Hill, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Ronald SsenyongaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, New Mulago Hospital Complex, Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Ritah TweheyoMarie Stopes Uganda, Plot 1020 Rose Lane, Kisugu-Muyenga, P.o. Box 10431, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew GiduduMarie Stopes Uganda, Plot 1020 Rose Lane, Kisugu-Muyenga, P.o. Box 10431, Kampala, Uganda.
Carole SekimpiMarie Stopes Uganda, Plot 1020 Rose Lane, Kisugu-Muyenga, P.o. Box 10431, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine Verde HashimMarie Stopes International, 1 Conway Street, Fitzroy Square, London, W1T 6LP, UK.
Martha NicholsonMarie Stopes International, 1 Conway Street, Fitzroy Square, London, W1T 6LP, UK.
Peter DdunguMarie Stopes Uganda, Plot 1020 Rose Lane, Kisugu-Muyenga, P.o. Box 10431, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvocacy for equity in health service utilization and access, including Family Planning (FP) continues to be a cornerstone in increasing universal health coverage. Inequities in Family planning are highlighted by the differences in reproductive health outcomes or in the distribution of resources among different population groups. In this study we examine inequities in use of modern contraceptives with respect to Socio-economic and Education dimensions in seven sub-regions in Uganda.

methodsThe data were obtained from a baseline cross-sectional study in seven statistical regions where a program entitled "Reducing High Fertility Rates and Improving Sexual Reproductive Health Outcomes in Uganda, (RISE)" is implemented in Uganda. There was a total of 3,607 respondents, half of whom were women of reproductive age (15-49 years) and the other half men (18-54 years). Equity in family planning utilization was assessed by geography, wealth/economic and social-demographics. The use of modern family planning was measured as; using or not using modern FP. Concentration indices were used to measure the degree of Inequality in the use of modern contraceptives. Prevalence Ratios to compare use of modern FP were computed using modified Poisson regression run in STATA V15.

resultsThree-quarters (75.6%) of the participants in rural areas were married compared to only 63% in the urban. Overall use of modern contraceptives was 34.2% [CI:30.9, 37.6], without significant variation by rural/urban settings. Women in the higher socio-economic status (SES) were more advantaged in use of modern contraceptives compared to lower SES women. The overall Erreygers Concentration Index, as a measure of inequity, was 0.172, p<0.001. Overall, inequity in use of modern contraceptives by education was highest in favor of women with higher education (ECI=0.146, p=0.0001), and the concentration of use of modern contraceptives in women with higher education was significant in the rural but not urban areas

conclusionInequities in the use of modern contraceptives still exist in favor of women with more education or higher socio-economic status, mainly in the rural settings. Focused programmatic interventions in rural settings should be delivered if universal Family Planning uptake is to be improved.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUgandaYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsEquityFamily planningModern contraceptives

Identifiers

PMID36855140
PMCPMC9972732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.