Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855105›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Feeding rates of malaria vectors from a prototype attractive sugar bait station in Western Province, Zambia: results of an entomological validation study.

Javan Chanda, Joseph Wagman, Benjamin Chanda, Tresford Kaniki, Mirabelle Ng'andu, Rayford Muyabe, Mwansa Mwenya, Jimmy Sakala, John Miller, Gift Mwaanga and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Javan Chanda *PATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Joseph Wagman *PATH, Washington, DC, USA. jwagman@path.org.
Benjamin ChandaPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Tresford KanikiPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mirabelle Ng'anduPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rayford MuyabePATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mwansa MwenyaPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jimmy SakalaPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
John MillerPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Gift MwaangaMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Limonty SimubaliMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Monicah Mirai MburuMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Edgar SimulunduMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Alice Mungo
Keith FraserImperial College London, London, UK.
Lazaro MwandighaImperial College London, London, UK.
Ruth AshtonSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Joshua YukichSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Angela F HarrisIVCC, Liverpool, UK.
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Erica OrangePATH, Seattle, USA.
Megan LittrellPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Julian EntwistleIVCC, Liverpool, UK.
Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust · ZMProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USInnovative Vector Control Consortium · GBRight to Care · ZMTulane University · USAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUImperial College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations are a promising new approach to malaria vector control that could compliment current tools by exploiting the natural sugar feeding behaviors of mosquitoes. Recent proof of concept work with a prototype ATSB

methodsThe product evaluated was the Sarabi v1.1.1 ASB station, which did not include insecticide but did include 0.8% uranine as a dye allowing for the detection, using UV fluorescence light microscopy, of mosquitoes that have acquired a sugar meal from the ASB. A two-phase, crossover study design was conducted in 10 village-based clusters in Western Province, Zambia. One study arm initially received 2 ASB stations per eligible structure while the other initially received 3. Primary mosquito sampling occurred via indoor and outdoor CDC Miniature UV Light Trap collection from March 01 through April 09, 2021 (Phase 1) and from April 19 to May 28, 2021 (Phase 2).

resultsThe dominant vector in the study area is Anopheles funestus s.l., which was the most abundant species group collected (31% of all Anophelines; 45,038/144,5550), had the highest sporozoite rate (3.16%; 66 positives out of 2,090 tested), and accounted for 94.3% (66/70) of all sporozoite positive specimens. Of those An. funestus specimens further identified to species, 97.2% (2,090/2,150) were An. funestus sensu stricto (s.s.). Anopheles gambiae s.l. (96.8% of which were Anopheles arabiensis) is a likely secondary vector and Anopheles squamosus may play a minor role in transmission. Overall, 21.6% (9,218/42,587) of An. funestus specimens and 10.4% (201/1,940) of An. gambiae specimens collected were positive for uranine, translating into an estimated daily feeding rate of 8.9% [7.7-9.9%] for An. funestus (inter-cluster range of 5.5% to 12.7%) and 3.9% [3.3-4.7%] for An. gambiae (inter-cluster range of 1.0-5.2%). Feeding rates were no different among mosquitoes collected indoors or outdoors, or among mosquitoes from clusters with 2 or 3 ASBs per eligible structure. Similarly, there were no correlations observed between feeding rates and the average number of ASB stations per hectare or with weekly rainfall amounts.

conclusionsAnopheles funestus and An. gambiae vector populations in Western Province, Zambia readily fed from the prototype Sarabi v1.1.1 ASB sugar bait station. Observed feeding rates are in line with those thought to be required for ATSB stations to achieve reductions in malaria transmission when used in combination with conventional control methods (IRS or LLIN). These results supported the decision to implement a large-scale, epidemiological cluster randomized controlled trial of ATSB in Zambia, deploying 2 ATSB stations per eligible structure.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaAnimalsCross-Over StudiesFluoresceinHumansMosquito VectorsSugarsZambiaFluoresceinSugars

Identifiers

PMID36855105
PMCPMC9974387
OpenAlexW4322718621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.