Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36855081›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2023

Interventions for the empowerment of older people and informal caregivers in transitional care decision-making: short report of a systematic review.

Lotan Kraun, Kristel De Vliegher, Moriah Ellen, Theo van Achterberg

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Contextualizing Caregiver Burden in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Dyadic Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lotan KraunNursing Departement, Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium. Lotan.kraun@vlaanderen.wgk.be.
Kristel De VliegherNursing Departement, Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium.
Moriah EllenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Theo van AchterbergKU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen · BEBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Horizon 2020,European Union 812656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare transitions across different settings necessitate careful decision-making for all parties involved, yet research indicates that older people and informal caregivers do not have a strong voice in such decisions.

objectiveTo provide a systematic overview of the literature about interventions designed to empower older people and informal caregivers in transitional care decision-making.

designA systematic review (Prospero Protocol CRD42020167961; funded by the EU's Horizon 2020 program). DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. REVIEW

methodsThe review included evaluations of empowerment in decision-making interventions for older people and informal caregivers facing care transitions, that were published from the inception of the databases up until April 2022. Data extractions were performed by two independent researchers and the quality of studies was assessed with the relevant JBI-critical appraisal tools. A narrative descriptive analysis of the results was performed.

findingsTen studies, reporting on nine interventions, and including a total of 4642 participants, were included. Interventions included transition preparation tools, support from transition coaches, shared decision-making interventions, and advance care planning. Designs and outcomes assessed were highly diverse and showed a mix of positive and lacking effects.

conclusionsThere is a lack of research on how to empower older people and their informal caregivers in transitional care decision-making. Empowerment in decision-making is usually not central in transitional care interventions, and effects on actual empowerment are mostly not assessed. Conclusions on how to empower older people and informal caregivers in transitional care decision-making cannot be drawn.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTransitional CareAgedCaregiversDatabases, FactualDecision Making, SharedHumansAgedDecision-makingEmpowermentTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID36855081
PMCPMC9976408
OpenAlexW4322625173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.