ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Incidental detection of retinoblastoma from accidental trauma in children.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo report a case series of patients who were diagnosed with retinoblastoma (RB), which was preceded by trauma, in a large multicenter cohort and to investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and causes of RB misdiagnosis.
methodsThe medical records of consecutive patients with RB between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Characteristics of trauma patients, including their age at initial trauma, site of trauma, sex, and RB laterality, were analyzed.
resultsAmong 3780 patients, 30 (0.8%) experienced systemic or ocular trauma prior to the detection of RB. The median age was 20.7 months, and the median follow-up time was 6 years. There were 2 eyes in stage A, 2 in stage B, 3 in stage C, 12 in stage D, and 15 in stage E. The remaining 2 eyes had extraocular RB. A total of 20 patients experienced ocular trauma, 9 patients experienced head trauma, and 1 patient experienced trauma in other body parts. RB was suspected or detected in 22 patients (73.3%) at the time of primary trauma occurrence, and 8 patients (26.7%) were misdiagnosed with RB during their first visit. Among them, all experienced blunt ocular trauma, and enucleation was performed in 7 patients in which 1 patient died.
conclusionsLess than 1% of the patients experienced systemic or ocular trauma before RB was detected. The majority were unilateral and in advanced stages. Differential diagnoses that are not trauma-related must always be considered, and comprehensive examinations must be conducted before diagnostic and therapeutic intraocular procedures are initiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.