Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854899›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

New, fast, and precise method of COVID-19 detection in nasopharyngeal and tracheal aspirate samples combining optical spectroscopy and machine learning.

Denny M Ceccon, Paulo Henrique R Amaral, Lídia M Andrade, Maria I N da Silva, Luis A F Andrade, Thais F S Moraes, Flavia F Bagno, Raissa P Rocha, Daisymara Priscila de Almeida Marques, Geovane Marques Ferreira and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denny M CecconDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Campus Pampulha 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 6627, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique R AmaralDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Campus Pampulha 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 6627, Brazil.
Lídia M AndradeDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Campus Pampulha 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 6627, Brazil.
Maria I N da SilvaDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Campus Pampulha 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 6627, Brazil.
Luis A F AndradeCentro de Tecnologia Em Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Thais F S MoraesLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Flavia F BagnoCentro de Tecnologia Em Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Raissa P RochaCentro de Tecnologia Em Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Daisymara Priscila de Almeida MarquesLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Geovane Marques FerreiraLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alice Aparecida LourençoLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ágata Lopes RibeiroLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jordana G A Coelho-Dos-ReisLaboratório de Virologia Básica E Aplicada, Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Flavio G da FonsecaCentro de Tecnologia Em Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
J C GonzalezDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, Campus Pampulha 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 6627, Brazil. gonzalez@fisica.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-1657
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-00418-20Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-01499-21Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais RED-00135-22Ministério da Educação 23072.211119/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast, precise, and low-cost diagnostic testing to identify persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus is pivotal to control the global pandemic of COVID-19 that began in late 2019. The gold standard method of diagnostic recommended is the RT-qPCR test. However, this method is not universally available, and is time-consuming and requires specialized personnel, as well as sophisticated laboratories. Currently, machine learning is a useful predictive tool for biomedical applications, being able to classify data from diverse nature. Relying on the artificial intelligence learning process, spectroscopic data from nasopharyngeal swab and tracheal aspirate samples can be used to leverage characteristic patterns and nuances in healthy and infected body fluids, which allows to identify infection regardless of symptoms or any other clinical or laboratorial tests. Hence, when new measurements are performed on samples of unknown status and the corresponding data is submitted to such an algorithm, it will be possible to predict whether the source individual is infected or not. This work presents a new methodology for rapid and precise label-free diagnosing of SARS-CoV-2 infection in clinical samples, which combines spectroscopic data acquisition and analysis via artificial intelligence algorithms. Our results show an accuracy of 85% for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples collected from asymptomatic patients or with mild symptoms, as well as an accuracy of 97% in tracheal aspirate samples collected from critically ill COVID-19 patients under mechanical ventilation. Moreover, the acquisition and processing of the information is fast, simple, and cheaper than traditional approaches, suggesting this methodology as a promising tool for biomedical diagnosis vis-à-vis the emerging and re-emerging viral SARS-CoV-2 variant threats in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Artificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningNasopharynxSARS-CoV-2Spectrum AnalysisArtificial intelligenceCOVID-19Label-free diagnosisMachine learningOptical spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36854899
PMCPMC9974055
OpenAlexW4322623145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.