Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854811›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2023

Predictive modelling of deliberate self-harm and suicide attempts in young people accessing primary care: a machine learning analysis of a longitudinal study.

Catherine M McHugh, Nicholas Ho, Frank Iorfino, Jacob J Crouse, Alissa Nichles, Natalia Zmicerevska, Elizabeth Scott, Nick Glozier, Ian B Hickie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine M McHughBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia. c.mchugh@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4891-4966
Nicholas HoBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Frank IorfinoBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Jacob J CrouseBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Alissa NichlesBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Natalia ZmicerevskaBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Elizabeth ScottBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Nick GlozierBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMachine learning (ML) has shown promise in modelling future self-harm but is yet to be applied to key questions facing clinical services. In a cohort of young people accessing primary mental health care, this study aimed to establish (1) the performance of models predicting deliberate self-harm (DSH) compared to suicide attempt (SA), (2) the performance of models predicting new-onset or repeat behaviour, and (3) the relative importance of factors predicting these outcomes.

methods802 young people aged 12-25 years attending primary mental health services had detailed social and clinical assessments at baseline and 509 completed 12-month follow-up. Four ML algorithms, as well as logistic regression, were applied to build four distinct models.

resultsThe mean performance of models predicting SA (AUC: 0.82) performed better than the models predicting DSH (AUC: 0.72), with mean positive predictive values (PPV) approximately twice that of the prevalence (SA prevalence 14%, PPV: 0.32, DSH prevalence 22%, PPV: 0.40). All ML models outperformed standard logistic regression. The most frequently selected variable in both models was a history of DSH via cutting.

conclusionHistory of DSH and clinical symptoms of common mental disorders, rather than social and demographic factors, were the most important variables in modelling future behaviour. The performance of models predicting outcomes in key sub-cohorts, those with new-onset or repetition of DSH or SA during follow-up, was poor. These findings may indicate that the performance of models of future DSH or SA may depend on knowledge of the individual's recent history of either behaviour.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentHumansLongitudinal StudiesPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsAdolescenceDeliberate self-harmMachine learningSuicidal behaviourSuicide attemptYouth

Identifiers

PMID36854811
PMCPMC10241686
OpenAlexW4322624806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.