Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854601›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in patients with septic shock (REDUSE): a protocol for a multicentre feasibility trial.

Anja Lindén, Jane Fisher, Gisela Lilja, Markus Harboe Olsen, Fredrik Sjövall, Mårten Jungner, Martin Spångfors, Line Samuelsson, Jonatan Oras, Adam Linder and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05249088 (Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids Versus Usual Care in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05249088 nacompletednot on this map

Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids Versus Usual Care in Septic Shock Patients: A Multicentre Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2022 to 2023Enrolled98ConditionsShock, SepticArmsProtocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anja LindénAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden anja.linden@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4839-921X
Jane FisherAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-901X
Gisela LiljaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Markus Harboe OlsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fredrik SjövallIntensive and Perioperative Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5612-0325
Mårten JungnerIntensive and Perioperative Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Martin SpångforsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kristianstad Hospital, Central Hospital in Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-899X
Line SamuelssonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Ostersund, Sweden.
Jonatan OrasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Adam LinderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan UndenDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Halland Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
T KanderIntensive and Perioperative Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-2981
Miklós LipcseyAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Niklas NielsenAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Janus C JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter BentzerAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdministration of large volumes of fluids is associated with poor outcome in septic shock. Recent data suggest that non-resuscitation fluids are the major source of fluids in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from septic shock. The present trial is designed to test the hypothesis that a protocol targeting this source of fluids can reduce fluid administration compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The design will be a multicentre, randomised, feasibility trial. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomised within 12 hours of admission to receive non-resuscitation fluids either according to a restrictive protocol or to receive usual care. The healthcare providers involved in the care of participants will not be blinded. The participants, outcome assessors at the 6-month follow-up and statisticians will be blinded. Primary outcome will be litres of fluids administered within 3 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be proportion of randomised participants with outcome data on all-cause mortality; days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 90 days of inclusion; any acute kidney injury and ischaemic events in the ICU (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia); proportion of surviving randomised patients who were assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment; proportion of all eligible patients who were randomised and proportion of participants experiencing at least one protocol violation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained in Sweden. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05249088.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryShock, SepticAdultCritical CareFeasibility StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadult intensive & critical careinfectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID36854601
PMCPMC9980317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.