ArticleBMJ open2023
Comparison of modified anterior and traditional posterior accesses for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.Annals of medicine · 2023Trial
- Article
- Multimodal imaging-guided awake transnasal fiberoptic tracheal intubation in a patient with giant palatal pleomorphic adenoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Success rates of endotracheal intubation using the standard method versus the modified-ramped position.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAwake tracheal intubation (ATI) involves placing a tracheal tube in an awake, spontaneously breathing patient. Superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) can effectively abolish the glottic closure reflex, and blunt the sensation of the structures above the cords. A method that consists of SLNB along with translaryngeal injection (TLI) can provide satisfactory anaesthesia and intubating conditions. We present a novel modified access of SLNB, ultrasound (US)-guided anterior SLNB, to aid awake videolaryngoscopes-assisted endotracheal intubation in adult elective surgery patients, and we compare the effectiveness and safety to traditional US-guided posterior SLNB. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 100 adult elective surgery patients requiring general endotracheal anaesthesia will be randomly assigned to the modified group (modified US-guided anterior SLNB) or the traditional group (traditional US-guided posterior SLNB). After SLNB, all participants will be performed with TLI. The primary outcome is the proportion of acceptable intubation conditions based on intubation scores. Secondary outcomes include: (a) the first-attempt intubation success rate, (b) haemodynamic changes during ATI, (c) time taken for airway anaesthesia and intubation, (d) recall of intubation, (e) participant perception of comfort during intubation, (f) perioperative complication rate. This report describes the study design of this randomised controlled trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by an ethical committee of the West China Hospital (Sichuan University), and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Register (www.chictr.org.cn). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200058086.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.