Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854591›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Economic evaluations of interventional opportunities for the management of mental-physical multimorbidity: a systematic review.

Amrit Banstola, Subhash Pokhrel, Benedict Hayhoe, Dasha Nicholls, Matthew Harris, Nana Anokye

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amrit BanstolaDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK amrit.banstola@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3185-9638
Subhash PokhrelDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1009-8553
Benedict HayhoeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2645-6191
Dasha NichollsDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7257-6605
Matthew HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-9710
Nana AnokyeDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-344X
Department of Medical Sciences · BYImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEconomic evaluations of interventions for people with mental-physical multimorbidity, including a depressive disorder, are sparse. This study examines whether such interventions in adults are cost-effective.

designA systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and NHS EED databases were searched until 5 March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies involving people aged ≥18 with two or more chronic conditions (one being a depressive disorder). Economic evaluation studies that compared costs and outcomes of interventions were included, and those that assessed only costs or effects were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently assessed risk of bias in included studies using recommended checklists. A narrative analysis of the characteristics and results by type of intervention and levels of healthcare provision was conducted.

resultsA total of 19 studies, all undertaken in high-income countries, met inclusion criteria. Four intervention types were reported: collaborative care, self-management, telephone-based and antidepressant treatment. Most (14 of 19) interventions were implemented at the organisational level and were potentially cost-effective, particularly, the collaborative care for people with depressive disorder and diabetes, comorbid major depression and cancer and depression and multiple long-term conditions. Cost-effectiveness ranged from £206 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for collaborative care programmes for older adults with diabetes and depression at primary care clinics (USA) to £79 723 per QALY for combining collaborative care with improved opportunistic screening for adults with depressive disorder and diabetes (England). Conclusions on cost-effectiveness were constrained by methodological aspects of the included studies: choice of perspectives, time horizon and costing methods.

conclusionsEconomic evaluations of interventions to manage multimorbidity with a depressive disorder are non-existent in low-income and middle-income countries. The design and reporting of future economic evaluations must improve to provide robust conclusions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022302036.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMultimorbidityAgedChecklistCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualHumansHEALTH ECONOMICSMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36854591
PMCPMC9980364
OpenAlexW4322626051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.