Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854571›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2023

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease: evolution over three decades.

Swee W Leong, Saskia Bos, James L Lordan, Arun Nair, Andrew J Fisher, Gerard Meachery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of pre-transplantation exposure to immunosuppressive agents on lung transplant outcomes in interstitial lung disease.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advanced interstitial lung disease: Evidence-based management and clinical approach.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Swee W LeongInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Saskia BosInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-5914
James L LordanInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Arun NairInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andrew J FisherInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4822-7223
Gerard MeacheryInstitute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK g.meachery@nhs.net.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSerdang Hospital · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) has emerged as the most common indication for lung transplantation globally. However, post-transplant survival varies depending on the underlying disease phenotype and comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the demographics, disease classification, outcomes and factors associated with post-transplant survival in a large single-centre cohort.

methodsData were retrospectively assessed for 284 recipients who underwent lung transplantation for ILD in our centre between 1987 and 2020. Patient characteristics and outcomes were stratified by three eras: 1987-2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2020.

resultsMedian patients' age at time of transplantation was significantly higher in the most recent decade (56 (51-61) years, p<0.0001). Recipients aged over 50 years had worse overall survival compared with younger patients (adjusted HR, aHR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.72, p=0.0001). Better survival was seen with bilateral versus single lung transplantation in patients younger than 50 years (log-rank p=0.0195). However, this survival benefit was no longer present in patients aged over 50 years. Reduced survival was observed in fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which remained the most common indication throughout (aHR 2.61, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.60, p=0.0015).

conclusionIn patients transplanted for end-stage ILD, older age and fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia were associated with poorer post-transplant survival. The benefit of bilateral over single lung transplantation diminished with increasing age, suggesting that single lung transplantation might still be a feasible option in older candidates.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Diseases, InterstitialLung TransplantationHumansPhenotypeRetrospective Studiesinterstitial fibrosislung transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36854571
PMCPMC9980330
OpenAlexW4322627302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.