Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854036›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

The EDGE2 protocol: Advancing the prioritisation of Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered species for practical conservation action.

Rikki Gumbs, Claudia L Gray, Monika Böhm, Ian J Burfield, Olivia R Couchman, Daniel P Faith, Félix Forest, Michael Hoffmann, Nick J B Isaac, Walter Jetz and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the use of taxonomy in the IUCN Red List.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biodiversity conservation requires consideration of different life history stages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Taxonomic and phylogenetic biases in translocated angiosperm plant species across European countries.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Conservation priorities for functionally unique and specialized terrestrial vertebrates threatened by biological invasions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Neutral phylogenetic models and their role in tree-based biodiversity measures.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Rikki GumbsConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4157-8549
Claudia L GrayConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Monika BöhmInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Ian J BurfieldBirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Olivia R CouchmanConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel P FaithSchool of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Michael HoffmannConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Nick J B IsaacUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Walter JetzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Georgina M MaceDepartment of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arne O MooersBiological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Kamran SafiMax-Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Department of Migration, Radolfzell, Germany.
Oenone ScottSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Mike SteelBiomathematics Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Caroline M TuckerEnvironment, Ecology and Energy Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
William D PearseDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Nisha R OwenConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
James RosindellDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation of evolutionary history has been linked to increased benefits for humanity and can be captured by phylogenetic diversity (PD). The Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) metric has, since 2007, been used to prioritise threatened species for practical conservation that embody large amounts of evolutionary history. While there have been important research advances since 2007, they have not been adopted in practice because of a lack of consensus in the conservation community. Here, building from an interdisciplinary workshop to update the existing EDGE approach, we present an "EDGE2" protocol that draws on a decade of research and innovation to develop an improved, consistent methodology for prioritising species conservation efforts. Key advances include methods for dealing with uncertainty and accounting for the extinction risk of closely related species. We describe EDGE2 in terms of distinct components to facilitate future revisions to its constituent parts without needing to reconsider the whole. We illustrate EDGE2 by applying it to the world's mammals. As we approach a crossroads for global biodiversity policy, this Consensus View shows how collaboration between academic and applied conservation biologists can guide effective and practical priority-setting to conserve biodiversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEndangered SpeciesAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumanitiesMammalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36854036
PMCPMC9974121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.