Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Comparative analysis of magnetically activated cell sorting and ultracentrifugation methods for exosome isolation.

Eda Ciftci, Naz Bozbeyoglu, Ihsan Gursel, Feza Korkusuz, Feray Bakan Misirlioglu, Petek Korkusuz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eda CiftciDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6900-4702
Naz BozbeyogluDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ihsan GurselDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Feza KorkusuzDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Feray Bakan MisirliogluNanotechnology Research and Application Center, Sabancı University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6467-8943
Petek KorkusuzDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7553-3915
Hacettepe University · TRBilkent University · TRSabancı Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes regulate cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, and synthesis of the extracellular matrix, giving great potential for the treatment of different diseases. The ultracentrifugation method is the gold standard method for exosome isolation due to the simple protocol, and high yield, but presents low purity and requires specialized equipment. Amelioration of technical optimization is required for quick and reliable confinement of exosomes to translate them to the clinic as cell therapeutics In this study, we hypothesized that magnetically activated cell sorting may provide, an effective, reliable, and rapid tool for exosome isolation when compared to ultracentrifugation. We, therefore, aimed to compare the efficiency of magnetically activated cell sorting and ultracentrifugation for human mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome isolation from culture media by protein quantification, surface biomarker, size, number, and morphological analysis. Magnetically activated cell sorting provided a higher purity and amount of exosomes that carry visible magnetic beads when compared to ultracentrifugation. The particle number of the magnetically activated cell sorting group was higher than the ultracentrifugation. In conclusion, magnetically activated cell sorting presents a quick, and reliable method to collect and present human mesenchymal stem cell exosomes to clinics at high purity for potential cellular therapeutic approaches. The novel isolation and purification method may be extended to different clinical protocols using different autogenic or allogeneic cell sources.

Indexed as

ExosomesAllogeneic CellsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCell SeparationHumansUltracentrifugation

Identifiers

PMID36854030
PMCPMC9974127
OpenAlexW4322624381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.