ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2023
Modeling normal bladder injury after radiation therapy.
Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-propelled nanozyme motors for targeted therapy of radiation cystitis by disrupting the inflammation-cfDNA vicious cycle.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Investigation of image-guided in vivo irradiation on voiding patterns and bladder contractility in female mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between rheumatoid arthritis and risk of radiotherapy toxicity: a systematic review.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor decades, Dr. John Moulder has been a leading radiation biologist and one of the few who consistently supported the study of normal tissue responses to radiation. His meticulous modeling and collaborations across the field have offered a prime example of how research can be taken from the bench to the bedside and back, with the ultimate goal of providing benefit to patients. Much of the focus of John's work was on mitigating damage to the kidney, whether as the result of accidental or deliberate clinical exposures. Following in his footsteps, we offer here a brief overview of work conducted in the field of radiation-induced bladder injury. We then describe our own preclinical experimental studies which originated as a response to reports from a clinical genome-wide association study (GWAS) investigating genomic biomarkers of normal tissue toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. In particular, we discuss the use of Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) inhibitors as modulators of injury, agents championed by the Moulder group, and how RAS inhibitors are associated with a reduction in some measures of toxicity. Using a murine model, along with precise CT-image guided irradiation of the bladder using single and fractionated dosing regimens, we have been able to demonstrate radiation-induced functional injury to the bladder and mitigation of this functional damage by an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme targeting the RAS, an experimental approach akin to that used by the Moulder group. We consider our scientific trajectory as a bedside-to-bench approach because the observation was made clinically and investigated in a preclinical model; this experimental approach aligns with the exemplary career of Dr. John Moulder.
conclusionsDespite the differences in functional endpoints, recent findings indicate a commonality between bladder late effects and the work in kidney pioneered by Dr. John Moulder. We offer evidence that targeting the RAS pathway may provide a targetable pathway to reducing late bladder toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.