Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853947›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention.

Antonio Fernández, Nina M Hanning, Marisa Carrasco

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prioritizing Working Memory Resources Depends on the Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of the Medial Posterior Parietal Cortex in Orchestrating Attention and Reaching.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prioritizing working memory resources depends on prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over Frontal Eye Fields Mimics Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio FernándezDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Nina M HanningDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-9056
New York University · USHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

Temporal Dynamics of Visual Perception and AttentionR01EY019693 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2010 to 2022
$4.0M
Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
How does covert attention modulate visual perception? Psychophysics, neurostimulation and neuroimagingF99NS120705 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FERNANDEZ, ANTONIO · 2021 to 2022
$73k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019693NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS120705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covert endogenous (voluntary) attention improves visual performance. Human neuroimaging studies suggest that the putative human homolog of macaque frontal eye fields (FEF+) is critical for this improvement, whereas early visual areas are not. Yet, correlational MRI methods do not manipulate brain function. We investigated whether rFEF+ or V1/V2 plays a causal role in endogenous attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to alter activity in the visual cortex or rFEF+ when observers performed an orientation discrimination task while attention was manipulated. On every trial, they received double-pulse TMS at a predetermined site (stimulated region) around V1/V2 or rFEF+. Two cortically magnified gratings were presented, one in the stimulated region (contralateral to the stimulated area) and another in the symmetric (ipsilateral) nonstimulated region. Grating contrast was varied to measure contrast response functions (CRFs) for all attention and stimulation combinations. In experiment 1, the CRFs were similar at the stimulated and nonstimulated regions, indicating that early visual areas do not modulate endogenous attention during stimulus presentation. In contrast, occipital TMS eliminates exogenous (involuntary) attention effects on performance [A. Fernández, M. Carrasco,

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationVisual CortexAnimalsFrontal LobeHumansMacacaOccipital Lobecontrast sensitivityfrontal cortexoccipital cortexTMSvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID36853947
PMCPMC10013745
OpenAlexW4322617299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.