ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023
A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining plant science training in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a global perspective.The Plant cell · 2026Review
- Building a diverse and inclusive plant science community.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Shaped by context: Evolutionary trajectories of desiccation tolerance in land plants.American journal of botany · 2026Review
- PharaohFUN: phylogenomic analysis for plant protein history and function elucidation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Empowering resilience: celebrating and accelerating women's transformative contributions to plant abiotic stress research (2010-2025).Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Beyond phylogeny: phytochemical diversity as a unique metric for biodiversity in the Gentianales.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Review
- Molecular aspects of heat stress sensing in land plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Evolution of sympatric host-specialized lineages of the fungal plant pathogen Zymoseptoria passerinii in natural ecosystems.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Interdisciplinarity through internationality: Results from a US-Mexico graduate course bridging computational and plant science.Plant direct · 2024Article
- Embracing complexity in plant-microbiome systems.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Review
- From Nature to Technology: Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based Materials and Modified Plants in Biomimetics, Bionics, and Green Innovations.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Unheard voices speak up: the Arabidopsis community and the representation of researchers from the Global South.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Drought stress mitigation through bioengineering of microbes and crop varieties for sustainable agriculture and food security.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Following the Principles of the Universe: Lessons from Plants on Individual and Communal Thriving.Integrative and comparative biology · 2023Article
- Overcoming citation bias is necessary for true inclusivity in Plant Science.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- Review
- A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Editorial: Women in plant biotechnology 2022.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Expression-based machine learning models for predicting plant tissue identity.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of plant science has grown dramatically in the past two decades, but global disparities and systemic inequalities persist. Here, we analyzed ~300,000 papers published over the past two decades to quantify disparities across nations, genders, and taxonomy in the plant science literature. Our analyses reveal striking geographical biases-affluent nations dominate the publishing landscape and vast areas of the globe have virtually no footprint in the literature. Authors in Northern America are cited nearly twice as many times as authors based in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, despite publishing in journals with similar impact factors. Gender imbalances are similarly stark and show remarkably little improvement over time. Some of the most affluent nations have extremely male biased publication records, despite supposed improvements in gender equality. In addition, we find that most studies focus on economically important crop and model species, and a wealth of biodiversity is underrepresented in the literature. Taken together, our analyses reveal a problematic system of publication, with persistent imbalances that poorly capture the global wealth of scientific knowledge and biological diversity. We conclude by highlighting disparities that can be addressed immediately and offer suggestions for long-term solutions to improve equity in the plant sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.