Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853829›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2023

Cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of Australians who use alcohol home delivery services.

Stephanie Colbert, Claire Wilkinson, Louise Thornton, Xiaoqi Feng, Anna Campain, Robyn Richmond

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie ColbertSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-0847
Claire WilkinsonDrug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-5840
Louise ThorntonSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Xiaoqi FengSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Anna CampainThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Robyn RichmondSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-4109
UNSW Sydney · AULa Trobe University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnline alcohol purchasing and home delivery has increased in recent years, accelerated by the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This article aims to investigate the purchasing and drinking behaviour of Australians who use online alcohol delivery services.

methodA cross-sectional self-report survey with a convenience sample of 1158 Australians ≥18 years (49.3% female) who used an online alcohol delivery service in the past 3 months, recruited through paid social media advertisements from September to November 2021. Quota sampling was used to obtain a sample with age and gender strata proportional to the Australian adult population. Descriptive statistics were generated and logistic regression used to explore variables that predict hazardous/harmful drinking (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score ≥8).

resultsOne-in-five (20.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.8-22.5) participants had used an alcohol delivery service to extend a home drinking session because they had run out of alcohol and wanted to continue drinking and, of these, one-third (33.9%, 95% CI 27.9-40.4) indicated that if the service was not available they would have stopped drinking. Using delivery services in this way was associated with six times higher odds of drinking at hazardous/harmful levels (odds ratio 6.26, 95% CI 3.78-10.36). Participants ≤25 years were significantly more likely to report never having their identification verified when receiving their alcohol delivery at the door compared with purchasing takeaway alcohol in-person at a bottle shop (p < 0.001, McNemar). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionGiven the risks associated with alcohol delivery, regulation of these services should be improved to meet the same standards as bricks-and-mortar bottle shops.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesAdultAlcoholismAustralasian PeopleAustraliaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEthanolFemaleHumansMaleEthanolalcoholdeliveryinternetonlinepolicy

Identifiers

PMID36853829
PMCPMC10947259
OpenAlexW4322617726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.