Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853796›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2023

An Automated Pipeline for Differential Cell Counts on Whole-Slide Bone Marrow Aspirate Smears.

Joshua E Lewis, Conrad W Shebelut, Bradley R Drumheller, Xuebao Zhang, Nithya Shanmugam, Michel Attieh, Michael C Horwath, Anurag Khanna, Geoffrey H Smith, David A Gutman and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Deep Learning in Hematology: From Molecules to Patients.Clinical hematology international · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua E LewisDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Conrad W ShebelutDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bradley R DrumhellerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Xuebao ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nithya ShanmugamDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michel AttiehDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael C HorwathDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anurag KhannaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Geoffrey H SmithDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
David A GutmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ahmed AljudiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lee A D CooperDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: lee.cooper@northwestern.edu.
David L JayeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: dljaye@emory.edu.
Emory University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Advanced Development of an Open-source Platform for Web-based Integrative Digital Image Analysis in CancerU24CA194362 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LEE, GUTMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Informatics Tools for Quantitative Digital Pathology Profiling and Integrated Prognostic ModelingU01CA220401 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LEE, FLOWERS, CHRISTOPHER R · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA220401NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathologic diagnosis of bone marrow disorders relies in part on the microscopic analysis of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) smears and the manual counting of marrow nucleated cells to obtain a differential cell count (DCC). This manual process has significant limitations, including the analysis of only a small subset of optimal slide areas and nucleated cells, as well as interobserver variability due to differences in cell selection and classification. To address these shortcomings, we developed an automated machine learning-based pipeline for obtaining 11-component DCCs on whole-slide BMAs. This pipeline uses a sequential process of identifying optimal BMA regions with high proportions of marrow nucleated cells, detecting individual cells within these optimal areas, and classifying these cells into 1 of 11 DCC components. Convolutional neural network models were trained on 396,048 BMA region, 28,914 cell boundary, and 1,510,976 cell class images from manual annotations. The resulting automated pipeline produced 11-component DCCs that demonstrated a high statistical and diagnostic concordance with manual DCCs among a heterogeneous group of testing BMA slides with varying pathologies and cellularities. Additionally, we demonstrated that an automated analysis can reduce the intraslide variance in DCCs by analyzing the whole slide and marrow nucleated cells within all optimal regions. Finally, the pipeline outputs of region classification, cell detection, and cell classification can be visualized using whole-slide image analysis software. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a fully automated pipeline for generating DCCs on scanned whole-slide BMA images, with the potential for improving the current standard of practice for utilizing BMA smears in the laboratory analysis of hematologic disorders.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCell CountHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computeraspiratebone marrowdifferentialmachine learningwhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID36853796
PMCPMC10310355
OpenAlexW4313887386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.