ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2023
Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations of Ampicillin and Sulbactam in Hospitalised Adult Patients.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ampicillin/Sulbactam in Combination with Ceftazidime/Avibactam Against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Genomics-Informed Mechanism-based model.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- An insight into pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of antimicrobials agents in elderly patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pharmacokinetic variability of ampicillin-sulbactam in adults has not been extensively described, particularly in patients with a reduced renal function (i.e., < 60 mL/min).
objectiveThis study investigated the population pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and sulbactam in patients with a wide range of renal functions and sought to define dosing approaches that have a high likelihood for optimising drug exposure.
methodsSerial blood samples were collected from 16 adult patients receiving intravenous ampicillin-sulbactam in general wards. Total ampicillin and sulbactam concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using Pmetrics
resultsThe median (range) age, weight, and serum creatinine of the study population was 68 (40-82) years, 62 (40-82) kg, and 1.4 (0.6-6.4) mg/dL, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and sulbactam were best described by a two-compartment model with serum creatinine most closely associated with clearance for both drugs. The estimated ampicillin and sulbactam clearances were 5.58 L/h and 4.79 L/h, respectively, while the volumes of distribution were 12.6 L and 15.36 L, respectively. Approved dosing regimens of ampicillin-sulbactam were sufficient against MICs ≤ 8 and ≤ 4 mg/L, respectively. A 4-h infusion enabled optimal PTA at higher MICs. For both dosing targets, optimal FTAs were obtained against Streptococcus pneumoniae.
conclusionOptimal FTAs were obtained against the susceptible MIC distributions of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Applying a 4-h infusion will enhance PTA and FTA, particularly at higher MICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.