Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853573›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Development of a diverse set of standard short forms based on the EORTC CAT Core item banks.

Morten Aa Petersen, Hugo Vachon, Mogens Groenvold, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of standard computerised adaptive test (CAT) settings for the EORTC CAT Core.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morten Aa PetersenPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23B, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark. Morten.Aagaard.Petersen@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3117-632X
Hugo VachonQuality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Mogens GroenvoldPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23B, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group has developed item banks covering the 14 domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire. These allow for dynamic assessment and for forming population/study specific static short forms. To simplify selection of relevant short forms, we here present a portfolio of standard short forms with measurement properties optimized for different populations.

methodsFor each domain, a brief and a long version were constructed for each of three populations having mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively. The most informative items were prioritised while also taking content into consideration. All short forms included at least one QLQ-C30 item. The measurement precision/power of the short forms was compared to the corresponding QLQ-C30 scales using simulations.

resultsIn total, 84 short forms were constructed. The brief versions included 3-5 items each, the long versions 5-9 items. Estimated sample size savings using the suggested short forms while maintaining the same power as with the QLQ-C30 ranged 3-50% across domains with median savings of 19% (brief versions) and 28% (long versions), respectively.

conclusionThe suggested short forms allow for simple selection of items particularly relevant for patients with mild, moderate, or severe symptoms, respectively. They facilitate the use of smaller samples without loss of power compared to the QLQ-C30 scales. The suggested short forms may be used as they are or adapted to the specific aims of individual studies/settings.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansPsychometricsSample SizeSurveys and QuestionnairesEORTC QLQ-C30IRTItem bankShort form

Identifiers

PMID36853573
PMCPMC10241674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.