Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853566›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Complications and Functional Outcome Differences in Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Surgery for Malignant Bone Tumors of the Pelvis: A Multicenter, Cohort Study.

Liuzhe Zhang, Toru Akiyama, Masanori Saito, Masahiko Okamoto, Tabu Gokita, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Keisuke Ae, Tatsuya Ohno

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Liuzhe ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Toru AkiyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan. toruakiyama827@jichi.ac.jp.
Masanori SaitoDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of The Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko OkamotoGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan.
Tabu GokitaDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroshi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke AeDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of The Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya OhnoGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan.
Gunma University Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an evolving treatment option for malignant pelvic tumors in patients with poor surgical indications. However, the difference in complications and functional outcomes between CIRT and surgery is poorly understood. This study compares the complications and functional outcomes of CIRT and surgery to facilitate treatment selection.

methodsA total of 28 patients who underwent CIRT for pelvic bone tumors while theoretically meeting the surgical resection criteria were included. Sixty-nine patients who underwent surgery for pelvic bone tumors were included as controls. Major complication rates and functional outcomes (ambulatory, pain, urination, constipation) were evaluated and compared at several time points (pretreatment, discharge, and final follow-up) between the groups.

resultsEarly (within 90 days) major complications were not observed in the CIRT group but occurred in 30% of the surgery group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In contrast, late (after 90 days) major complications occurred more often in the CIRT group than in the surgery group (18% and 4%, respectively; P = 0.042). From pretreatment until discharge, all functional outcomes in the surgery group deteriorated (P < 0.001 for all) but did not change in the CIRT group (P = 0.77-1.00). At the final follow-up, all functional outcomes showed no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.28-0.92) due to the recovery trend in the surgery group and the deterioration trend in the CIRT group.

conclusionsCompared with surgery, CIRT may have favorable safety and stable functional outcomes in the short-term but more late complications. Mid-term functional outcomes were similar between the groups.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsHeavy Ion RadiotherapyPelvic NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansPelvis

Identifiers

PMID36853566
OpenAlexW4322616520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.