Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853469›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Myxoid Liposarcomas: Systemic Treatment Options.

Elise F Nassif, Emily Z Keung, Prapassorn Thirasastr, Neeta Somaiah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Impact of unplanned surgery on prognosis of myxoid liposarcoma and analysis of salvage treatment strategies].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Diagnosis and Treatment of Myxoid Liposarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elise F NassifDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-6759
Emily Z KeungDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Prapassorn ThirasastrDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, USA.
Neeta SomaiahDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, USA. nsomaiah@mdanderson.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementMyxoid/round-cell liposarcoma (MRCL) account for 30% of liposarcomas and are the most chemo-sensitive subtype of liposarcoma. The 5-year local relapse and distant metastasis rates are 10% and 20%, respectively. In the advanced setting, the first-line median progression-free survival and overall survival is 9 and 30 months, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST with anthracycline-based chemotherapy is around 40% and with trabectedin is 20%, although response is higher when captured by CHOI criteria. Anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy regimens remain the standard of care first-line treatment option. However, trabectedin is also effective and may be considered in the first-line setting when anthracyclines cannot be prescribed. Beyond chemotherapy, new therapeutic classes are being developed, including autologous adoptive modified T cell receptor cellular therapies which have shown promising results thus far. These new therapies utilize the immunogenic potential of cancer testis antigens, NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4, which are expressed in the vast majority of MRCL. Early phase trials have shown encouraging results with up to 40% ORR and a median progression-free survival up to 8.7 months. Other innovative strategies are being developed, tailored to the molecular biology of MRCL. This review summarizes current evidence for the use of standard chemotherapy and the new biomarker-selected treatments under development.

Indexed as

Liposarcoma, MyxoidAdultAnthracyclinesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalTrabectedinAnthracyclinesTrabectedinAdoptive T cell therapiesCancer testis antigensDoxorubicinMyxoid liposarcomaRound-cell liposarcomaTrabectedin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.