ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
The relationship of airflow limitation with lung squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared diagnostic genes and potential mechanisms between asthma and lung cancer revealed by integrated transcriptomic analysis and machine learning.European journal of translational myology · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of lung cancer patients with CPFE or COPD: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Landscape of targeted therapies for lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies showed associations between smoking, and airflow limitation, with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). However, the causal association of airflow limitation with LUSC and the modification by smoking status for the association remains unclear.
methodsGenetic summary data were obtained from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). One hundred two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for airflow limitation (i.e., FEV1/FVC < 0.7) and 153 SNPs for smoking behavior were used as instrumental variables and the main MR analysis methods. The univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization (MR) in a two-sample setting were performed to assess the association of airflow limitation, and smoking behavior with LUSC.
resultsIn the univariable MR analysis, genetic predisposition towards airflow limitation [Inverse Variance-Weighted (IVW) method Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.83, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.55 to 15.06, P = 0.006], age of smoking initiation (IVW method OR = 0.10, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.36, P < 0.001), cigarettes smoked per day (IVW method OR = 3.10, 95%CI 2.07 to 4.63, P < 0.001), ex-smoking (IVW method OR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.69, P < 0.001), current smoking status (IVW method OR = 13.08, 95%CI 2.53 to 67.84, P = 0.002), pack-years of smoking (Weighted median method OR = 11.49, 95%CI 3.71 to 35.63, P < 0.001) were associated with LUSC. In the multivariable MR analysis, the causal effect of airflow limitation was still observed on LUSC (IVW method OR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.09 to 8.04, P = 0.032 adjusted for age of smoking initiation and cigarettes smoked per day; IVW method OR = 3.24, 95% CI 1.09 to 9.58, P = 0.033 adjusted for ex-smoking, current smoking status, and pack years of smoking; IVW method OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.01 to 8.41, P = 0.049 adjusted for 5 smoking behaviors mentioned above).
conclusionsOur MR analysis demonstrated that airflow limitation is likely to be an independent predictor of LUSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.