ArticleExperimental brain research2023
Studying cognitive-motor interactions using a tablet-based application of the Color Trails Test.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of wearables with behavioral prompts on physical and cognitive outcomes in community-dwelling older adults: preliminary results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Color Trails Test (CTT) is a pen and paper (P&P) test designed to measure cognitive function. The test consists of two parts that evaluate primarily sustained visual attention (Trails A) and divided attention (Trails B). Based on clinical interest in converting neuropsychological testing from P&P to computerized testing, we developed a digital version of the CTT ('Tablet-CTT'). Twenty-four young, healthy participants performed Trails A and B of both the original P&P and the Tablet-CTT. Hand kinematics were calculated using the continuous location of an electronic pen on the tablet touch screen. To compare motor control aspects, we differentiated for each test session the 'movement planning' and 'movement execution' times (accumulated across all single target-to-target trajectories). Concurrent validity was demonstrated by the high correlation between completion times of the P&P and Tablet-CTT, in both Trails A (r = 0.6; p < 0.005) and Trails B (r = 0.8; p < 0.001). Trails B yielded significantly longer completion times in both formats (p < 0.001). Examining hand kinematics in Tablet-CTT revealed that the difference in durations was mostly due to prolonged planning time, but also due to significantly lower execution velocity in Trails B (p < 0.001). Lastly, we found increased hand velocity during the planning phase in Trails B compared to Trails A (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates how transforming the CTT to a digital platform could be useful for studying cognitive-motor interactions in healthy individuals. Moreover, it could potentially serve as a diagnosis tool by introducing a more comprehensive testing method that incorporates online recordings of hand movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36853381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.