Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853337›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2024

Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal airway and tongue space following treatment with Herbst and AdvanSync appliances : A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Suman Arora, Seema Grover, Pandurangan Harikrishnan, Ashish Dabas, Namrata Dogra, Jasmine Nindra

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suman AroraDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-7382
Seema GroverDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-8835
Pandurangan HarikrishnanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India. teethnjaws@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-2870
Ashish DabasDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-6738
Namrata DograDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-2945
Jasmine NindraDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurgaon (Haryana), India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-6596
Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate and compare pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes after treatment with fixed functional appliances-Herbst and AdvanSync™ (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) appliances-in skeletal class II patients in pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms.

methodsFor this randomized, controlled trial, 40 patients (21 male, 19 female) were divided into two groups-a Herbst group (mean age 12.6 ± 0.67 years) and an AdvanSync group (mean age 12.8 ± 0.66 years). Pre- and posttreatment (appliance therapy duration-8 months) lateral cephalograms were traced using a software program to evaluate pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes.

resultsNasopharyngeal airway, velopharyngeal airway, glossopharyngeal airway, and hypopharyngeal airway increased in the Herbst group by 2.12 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.33 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.40 mm (p ≤ 0.01), and 1.57 mm (p ≤ 0.05), while in the AdvanSync group the increases were 1.89 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.21 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.18 mm (p ≤ 0.001), and 1.53 mm (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. In the Herbst group, tongue length and height increases were 2.04 mm (p ≤ 0.01) and 3.74 mm (p ≤ 0.001), while the values in the AdvanSync group were 2.41 mm (p ≤ 0.05) and 2.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001). The change of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane was 0.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the Herbst group and 0.77 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the AdvanSync group. The velopharyngeal airway dimension was correlated positively with that of the retroglossal oropharyngeal airway, which in-turn positively correlated with the laryngopharyngeal airway which correlated well with the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane.

conclusionsThe airway dimensions and tongue parameters increased significantly in both treatment groups in the present study. These changes were higher in the Herbst appliance than in the AdvanSync group, except for the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane. A significant difference between the pharyngeal airways was found only for the retropalatal oropharyngeal airway.

Indexed as

CephalometryMalocclusion, Angle Class IIOrthodontic Appliances, FunctionalPharynxTongueChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeClass II malocclusionFixed functional appliancesObstructive sleep apneaOropharyngeal airwayTongue space

Identifiers

PMID36853337
OpenAlexW4322616487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.