Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853315›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Factors Affecting Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in North India.

Kapil Kumar, Anshu Mittal, Deepmala Kamboj, Gauri Shankar Goel, Anuj Mittal, Sumesh Kumar Garg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Baseline functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 predict overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kapil KumarDepartment of Community Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar, Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-8784
Anshu MittalMaharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, Mullana (Ambala), India.
Deepmala KambojDepartment of Mathematics, Mukand Lal National College, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India.
Gauri Shankar GoelDepartment of Community Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar, Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Anuj MittalDepartment of Community Medicine, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government Medical College, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Sumesh Kumar GargDepartment of General Surgury, Adesh Medical College, Shahbad, Haryana, India.
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana · INCU Shah Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer is the second leading reason of death in many countries, and its burden and prognosis are highly dependent on disease stage at diagnosis. Lack of perception of the population about cancer and its related risk factors usually sequel in defer/delayed presentation and increased treatment morbidity and decrease survival chances. Quality of life (QOL) is defined as Individual view of life, merits, intentions, standards and interests in the framework of culture. AIMS AND

objectivesTo study the socio-demographic profile and factors affecting quality of life of cancer patients. MATERIAL AND

methodUsing a cross-sectional study, between 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021, 192 cancer confirmed patients at cancer registry centre at District civil hospital, Ambala cantt. were interviewed using a pre tested semi-structured questionnaire along with EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) questionnaire scale for QOL. The data was entered into an excel sheet and was analysed using IBM SPSS version 28.

resultsOut of 192 patients, 95 were male and 97 were female. Results shows that female (60.05±19.167) had better mean score of QL2 than male (58.68±18.906) with P value=0.619. Overweight (BMI25.0-29.9) had better mean QL2 score (65.50±18.147) than obese (BMI>30.0) mean QL2 score (61.67±14.803), normal weight (BMI 18.0-24.9) mean QL2 score (59.57±18.575) and underweight (BMI<18.0) mean QL2 score (49.46±19.595) with P value of 0.004.

conclusionPresent study found that QOL had significant association with BMI, type of cancer, history of smoking, lost income after cancer diagnosis and stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis. While gender, occupation, age group, religion, residence, marital status, type of family, income, tobacco alcohol and physical activity showed no significance association with QOL.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansIndiaMalecancerEortc qlq-c30 questionnaireQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID36853315
PMCPMC10162617
OpenAlexW4322616541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.