ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Convolution Neural Network for Breast Cancer Detection and Classification Using Deep Learning.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convolutional neural network and AI technology for colleges and universities students' achievement performance prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Novel Hybrid CNN-ViT-Based Bi-Directional Cross-Guidance Fusion-Driven Breast Cancer Detection Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BreasTransNeXt: An Enhanced Multi-Module Vision Transformer For Early Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of federated versus centralized learning for mammography classification across film-digital domain shift.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Fusion of genomic and pathological data for breast cancer detection using BCDNN.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Automated breast cancer diagnosis via intensity-guided contour segmentation and ResNet-based classification using local intensity pattern tensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breast cancer diagnosis from histopathological images and molecular signatures by fusing features with an explainable AI-based residual tabular network model.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Low-Cost Microalgae Cell Concentration Estimation in Hydrochemistry Applications Using Computer Vision.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer Classification with Various Optimized Deep Learning Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing breast cancer diagnosis: token vision transformers for faster and accurate classification of histopathology images.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
- Use and Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques to Discern the Protein Patterns of Autoantibodies Present in Women with and without Breast Pathology.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Explainable AI-enabled hybrid deep learning architecture for breast cancer detection.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Divulging Patterns: An Analytical Review for Machine Learning Methodologies for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- Diagnostic dilemma of lobular carcinoma: a mini-review of imaging modalities and the role of artificial intelligence and radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Early detection and analysis of accurate breast cancer for improved diagnosis using deep supervised learning for enhanced patient outcomes.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Intra-tumor and peritumoral radiomics and deep learning based on ultrasound for differentiating fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- MR_NET: A Method for Breast Cancer Detection and Localization from Histological Images Through Explainable Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automating cancer diagnosis using advanced deep learning techniques for multi-cancer image classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Enhancing accessibility for improved diagnosis with modified EfficientNetV2-S and cyclic learning rate strategy in women with disabilities and breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection and precise diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) plays an essential part in enhancing the diagnosis and improving the breast cancer survival rate of patients from 30 to 50%. Through the advances of technology in healthcare, deep learning takes a significant role in handling and inspecting a great number of X-ray, MRI, CTR images. The aim of this study is to propose a deep learning model (BCCNN) to detect and classify breast cancers into eight classes: benign adenosis (BA), benign fibroadenoma (BF), benign phyllodes tumor (BPT), benign tubular adenoma (BTA), malignant ductal carcinoma (MDC), malignant lobular carcinoma (MLC), malignant mucinous carcinoma (MMC), and malignant papillary carcinoma (MPC).
methodsBreast cancer MRI images were classified into BA, BF, BPT, BTA, MDC, MLC, MMC, and MPC using a proposed Deep Learning model with additional 5 fine-tuned Deep learning models consisting of Xception, InceptionV3, VGG16, MobileNet and ResNet50 trained on ImageNet database. The dataset was collected from Kaggle depository for breast cancer detection and classification. That Dataset was boosted using GAN technique. The images in the dataset have 4 magnifications (40X, 100X, 200X, 400X, and Complete Dataset). Thus we evaluated the proposed Deep Learning model and 5 pre-trained models using each dataset individually. That means we carried out a total of 30 experiments. The measurement that was used in the evaluation of all models includes: F1-score, recall, precision, accuracy.
resultsThe classification F1-score accuracies of Xception, InceptionV3, ResNet50, VGG16, MobileNet, and Proposed Model (BCCNN) were 97.54%, 95.33%, 98.14%, 97.67%, 93.98%, and 98.28%, respectively.
conclusionDataset Boosting, preprocessing and balancing played a good role in enhancing the detection and classification of breast cancer of the proposed model (BCCNN) and the fine-tuned pre-trained models' accuracies greatly. The best accuracies were attained when the 400X magnification of the MRI images due to their high images resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.