Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853286›Full record

SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Value of Conventional MRI, DCE-MRI, and DWI-MRI in the Discrimination of Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.

Arvin Arian, Hayder Jasim Taher, Hayder Suhail Najm Alareer, Mehdi Aghili

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arvin ArianMD Radiology, TUMS (Cancer Institute‑ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Hayder Jasim TaherTechnology of Radiology and Radiotherapy Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus, Tehran, Iran.
Hayder Suhail Najm AlareerRadiology Department, Collage of Health & Medical Technology, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, Iraq.
Mehdi AghiliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, despite many studies on the diagnosis of metastasis to lymph nodes (LNs) in Rectal Cancer (RC), its diagnosis is still very challenging for radiologists. The purpose of the present study was to the assessment of the diagnostic value of conventional MRI, DCE-MRI, and DWI-MRI in the discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in RC.

methodsIn the present meta-analysis study, we surveyed international databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Science Direct with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated and the data were analyzed using STATA version 14. Finally, the results of the studies were entered into the random-effects meta-analysis.  Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and for evaluating publication bias, Funnel plots and Egger tests were used.

results31 articles published between 2005 and 2021, comprising 2517 patients were included in the present study. The sensitivity and specificity of DCE-MRI were 83% (74% to 80%), and 86% (80% to 93%), respectively with PPV 84% (76% to 89%) and NPV 88% (79% to 95%). Also, the sensitivity and specificity of DWI-MRI were 81% (74% to 88%), and 74% (78% to 91%), respectively with PPV 63% (54% to 74%), NPV 85% (77% to 93%), AUC 80 % (75% to 86%) and accuracy 82% (75% to 88%). For conventional MRI, the sensitivity 74% (67% to 80%), specificity 77% (71% to 83%), PPV 62% (48% to 69%), NPV 70% (62% to 77%), AUC 78% (72% to 83%) and 71% accuracy (68% to 78%) was obtained.

conclusionBased on our finding DCE-MRI is the most suitable technique for the discrimination of metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualHumansLymph NodesDCE-MRIDiscriminationDWI-MRIrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36853286
PMCPMC10162625
OpenAlexW4322616646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.