Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36852493›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Influence of the maternity unit and region of delivery on episiotomy practice in France: a nationwide population-based study.

Julie Cormier, Jade Merrer, Béatrice Blondel, Camille Le Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Frequency of episiotomy practice in an institution in Quito, Ecuador 2009-2022].Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie CormierObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-7266
Jade MerrerObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6379-6953
Béatrice BlondelObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-8317
Camille Le RayObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Université de Paris, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.

Funding

Direction de la Recherche, des Études, de l'Évaluation et des StatistiquesDirection Générale de la SantéDirection Générale de l'Organisation des Soins
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur objective was to identify factors associated with episiotomy practice in France, in particular, characteristics of the maternity units and regions of delivery. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a national cross-sectional population-based study in all French maternity units in 2016 including 9284 women with vaginal delivery. Our outcome was the performance of an episiotomy. After stratification for parity, associations of episiotomy practice with individual and organizational characteristics and the region of delivery were estimated with multilevel logistic regression models. The variability in maternity unit episiotomy rates explained by the characteristics studied was estimated by the proportional change in variance.

resultsA total of 19.9% of the women had an episiotomy. The principal factors associated with episiotomy practice were maternal and obstetric and delivery in a maternity unit with <2000 annual deliveries. After adjusting for individual, obstetric and organizational characteristics, the practice of episiotomy was strongly associated with women's region of delivery. Additionally, women's individual characteristics did not explain the significant variability in episiotomy rates between maternity units (P < 0.001) but maternity unit characteristics partly did (proportion of variance explained: 7.2% for primiparas and 13.6% for multiparas) and regional differences still more (18% and 30.7%, respectively).

conclusionsEpisiotomy practices in France in 2016 varied strongly between maternity units, largely due to regional differences. Targeted actions by the regional perinatal care networks may reduce the national episiotomy rate and standardize practices.

Indexed as

associated factorsepisiotomymaternity unitsorganizational characteristicsregionsvariability

Identifiers

PMID36852493
PMCPMC10008350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.