ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023
Biomechanical Analysis of Lark-Loop, Lasso-Loop and Krackow Suture Technique in Tenodesis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subscapularis Tendon Repair Using Transtendon Double-Pulley Technique With All-Suture Anchor.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using Standard Portals.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveStrong tendon grasping is vital to the success of a tenodesis operation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initial tendon-fixation strength of the Lark-Loop technique in arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis and compare it with others commonly used techniques.
methodsThirty-three porcine superficial flexor digitorum tendons were harvested from a local slaughterhouse and randomly divided into three groups to perform three tendon fixation techniques (Lasso-Loop stich group, Lark-Loop stich group or Krackow stich group; 11 tendons each group) with a No. 2 suture, respectively. Each tendon was pre-tensioned in 5°N for 2 min and then cyclically loaded 5 to 30°N for 500 cycles to assess displacement. After cyclic loading, the tendon was loaded to ultimate tendon-suture configuration failure at the rate of 1 mm/s. Finally, the mode of failure and the construct stiffness of the tendon were recorded and calculated.
resultsAfter cyclical loading, the displacement of the Lark-Loop group was equivalent to the Krakow group (P > 0.9999) but significantly smaller than the Lasso-Loop group (P = 0.0009). The ultimate load to failure for the Lark-Loop was equivalent to the Krakow technique group (P = 0.1463) but significantly greater than the Lasso-Loop group (P < 0.0001). The stiffness for the Lark-Loop was equivalent to the Krakow group (P = 0.4718) but significantly greater than the Lasso-Loop technique group (P < 0.0001). In the Lark-Loop and Krackow group, all the tendons failed by suture breakage, while all the tendons failed by suture cutting through the tendon in the Lasso-Loop technique group.
conclusionLark-Loop suture technique has biomechanical properties comparable to Krackow and superior to the Lasso-Loop in terms of suture displacement, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness. Therefore, the Lark-Loop suture fixation technique may be beneficial for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.