ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
The value of arterial spin labelling perfusion MRI in brain age prediction.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced neuroimaging assessment of neurodegenerative dementia syndromes: A framework for comprehensive multimodal FDG-PET, MR-perfusion, and MR-diffusion analysis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Decoding Brain Development and Aging: Pioneering Insights From MRI Techniques.Investigative radiology · 2025Review
- Multi-cohort, multi-sequence harmonisation for cerebrovascular brain age.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Collateral circulation significantly improves prognosis in cerebral infarction: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Assessing the Utility of Predicted Brain Age for Explaining Variability in Language Abilities in Healthy Older Adults.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Aging and Sex Differences in Brain Volume and Cerebral Blood Flow.Aging and disease · 2024Article
- Article
- The value of arterial spin labelling perfusion MRI in brain age prediction.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current structural MRI-based brain age estimates and their difference from chronological age-the brain age gap (BAG)-are limited to late-stage pathological brain-tissue changes. The addition of physiological MRI features may detect early-stage pathological brain alterations and improve brain age prediction. This study investigated the optimal combination of structural and physiological arterial spin labelling (ASL) image features and algorithms. Healthy participants (n = 341, age 59.7 ± 14.8 years) were scanned at baseline and after 1.7 ± 0.5 years follow-up (n = 248, mean age 62.4 ± 13.3 years). From 3 T MRI, structural (T1w and FLAIR) volumetric ROI and physiological (ASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) and spatial coefficient of variation ROI features were constructed. Multiple combinations of features and machine learning algorithms were evaluated using the Mean Absolute Error (MAE). From the best model, longitudinal BAG repeatability and feature importance were assessed. The ElasticNetCV algorithm using T1w + FLAIR+ASL performed best (MAE = 5.0 ± 0.3 years), and better compared with using T1w + FLAIR (MAE = 6.0 ± 0.4 years, p < .01). The three most important features were, in descending order, GM CBF, GM/ICV, and WM CBF. Average baseline and follow-up BAGs were similar (-1.5 ± 6.3 and - 1.1 ± 6.4 years respectively, ICC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9, p = .16). The addition of ASL features to structural brain age, combined with the ElasticNetCV algorithm, improved brain age prediction the most, and performed best in a cross-sectional and repeatability comparison. These findings encourage future studies to explore the value of ASL in brain age in various pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.