Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36852415›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Modeling human observer detection in undersampled magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction with total variation and wavelet sparsity regularization.

Alexandra G O'Neill, Emely L Valdez, Sajan Goud Lingala, Angel R Pineda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra G O'NeillManhattan College, Department of Mathematics, New York City, New York, United States.
Emely L ValdezManhattan College, Department of Mathematics, New York City, New York, United States.
Sajan Goud LingalaUniversity of Iowa, Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-6256
Angel R PinedaManhattan College, Department of Mathematics, New York City, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-0511
Manhattan College · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Optimizing Acquisition and Reconstruction of Under-sampled MRI for Signal DetectionR15EB029172 · NIBIB · MANHATTAN COLLEGE · PI PINEDA, ANGEL RAMON · 2020 to 2023
$827k
NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB029172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Task-based assessment of image quality in undersampled magnetic resonance imaging provides a way of evaluating the impact of regularization on task performance. In this work, we evaluated the effect of total variation (TV) and wavelet regularization on human detection of signals with a varying background and validated a model observer in predicting human performance. Approach: Human observer studies used two-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) trials with a small signal known exactly task but with varying backgrounds for fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images reconstructed from undersampled multi-coil data. We used a 3.48 undersampling factor with TV and a wavelet sparsity constraints. The sparse difference-of-Gaussians (S-DOG) observer with internal noise was used to model human observer detection. The internal noise for the S-DOG was chosen to match the average percent correct (PC) in 2-AFC studies for four observers using no regularization. That S-DOG model was used to predict the PC of human observers for a range of regularization parameters. Results: We observed a trend that the human observer detection performance remained fairly constant for a broad range of values in the regularization parameter before decreasing at large values. A similar result was found for the normalized ensemble root mean squared error. Without changing the internal noise, the model observer tracked the performance of the human observers as the regularization was increased but overestimated the PC for large amounts of regularization for TV and wavelet sparsity, as well as the combination of both parameters. Conclusions: For the task we studied, the S-DOG observer was able to reasonably predict human performance with both TV and wavelet sparsity regularizers over a broad range of regularization parameters. We observed a trend that task performance remained fairly constant for a range of regularization parameters before decreasing for large amounts of regularization.

Indexed as

constrained reconstructionimage quality assessmentmagnetic resonance imagingmodel observers

Identifiers

PMID36852415
PMCPMC9961227
OpenAlexW4322007984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.